RE: [Rlib-users] flow and fixed parts

[Al A. <aa...@ge...>]

Then is there any point to the layout attribute in a <part> tag?


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Roth [mailto:mr...@si...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:06 PM
To: Al Arzaga
Cc: RLIB USERS
Subject: Re: [Rlib-users] flow and fixed parts


Al:

There really is no difference between fixed and flow parts - this needs
to be removed. 

The modularity your are referring is independent of parts. However,
using different files to include things like headers and footers is 
a great way of creating a common code base/look and feel among reports.

Best Regards,

Mike

On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:04 -0500, Al Arzaga wrote:
> Am I right to assume that the major difference between flow and fixed
parts
> is that flow parts involve storing the reports modularly in different xml
> files, while fixed parts mean you store everything in one monolithic xml
> file?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Rlib-users mailing list
> Rli...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users