re[2]: [Rlib-users] new test release soon

[John B. <jo...@ma...>]

> swig looks really nice...  I wish I saw that earlier... I'll go swig
> instead... so that way we can have tons of bindings ;)

Yeah, I was one of the early developers on it, years and years ago.  =
Once you define the C bindings, it'll do everything else for you. The =
only caveat is that it doesn't make crash-proof APIs (ie, no real =
parameter checking) but for rlib, that should be fine.

-john


> - Bob

> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 17:55, John Buckman wrote:
> > have you thought of wrapping rlib with SWIG http://www.swig.org/
> >=20
> > That would give you library capability from:
> >=20
> > Tcl 8.0 and newer versions.=20
> > Python 1.5 and newer.=20
> > Perl 5.003 or newer.=20
> > Guile 1.3.4 and newer.
> > Java JDK 1.1 and newer.=20
> > Ruby.=20
> > Mzscheme.
> >=20
> > and it's super easy give that you have a C api.
> >=20




> > > John.. do you have any more patches for me you want in for =
general
> > > testing?
> >=20
> > Just that command line program, otherwise I didn't end up needing =
to keep any changes
> I made.
> >=20
> > -john
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> > help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rlib-users mailing list
> > Rli...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users
> >=20