Re: [Rlib-devel] RLIB version for Windows

[Zoltan B. <zb...@du...>]

Bob Doan írta:
> Zoltan,
>
>   
>> Bob, it would be better to name the bindings something else
>> than just rlib.so or rlib.dll to avoid such conflicts - it's not yet
>> carved in stone as rlib-1.3.8 is still a development version, right?
>> Upgrading from 1.2.x to 2.0 will require script and API/ABI
>> changes in apps already. Changing it during 2.x would be
>> much harder as API/ABI stability is a must there.
>>     
>
> Wouldn't things like mysql have the same problems?
>   

I just  checked, no. RLIB produces a libr-{inputname}.{so | dll}
e.g. libr-odbc.dll libr-mysql.dll etc. So RLIB doesn't have such problems
with the INPUT modules. The bindings are problematic.
E.g. RLIB Perl binding also has rlib.so.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi