Re: [Rlib-devel] RLIB version for Windows

[Bob D. <bd...@si...>]

Zoltan,

> 
> Bob, it would be better to name the bindings something else
> than just rlib.so or rlib.dll to avoid such conflicts - it's not yet
> carved in stone as rlib-1.3.8 is still a development version, right?
> Upgrading from 1.2.x to 2.0 will require script and API/ABI
> changes in apps already. Changing it during 2.x would be
> much harder as API/ABI stability is a must there.

Wouldn't things like mysql have the same problems?