From: Bob D. <bd...@si...> - 2006-01-01 21:04:22
|
Hi, Sorry for the delayed response. First can you send patches in unified diff format so they are easier to read. (diff -u) Your patch would break RLIB detecting if it should build Python bindings. Before I could apply the acsite.m4 stuff I would need to better understand why it's better across distributions. What's wrong w/ the existing detection? config.h.in is generated w/ autoheader when you run autogen.sh before you build from CVS I have no idea why the documentation does not compile :( I am in the process of moving all RLIB documentation to a wiki (newrlib.sicom.com) Thanks! - Bob On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:59 +0100, Aldo Nicolas Bruno wrote: > > Hi, I've had problems compiling rlib (lastest CVS) with python support > on my Debian Sid/PPC > > I fixed the problems by adding a macro to acsite.m4 and modifying > configure.in and bindings/python/Makefile.am > > I've attached the patch and the acsite.m4 > > I've also noticed that the config.h.in was missing from CVS > Also the documentation does not compile, I don't know exacty why. I've > attached the gzipped book.log > > Best regards > > -- > > Aldo Nicolas Bruno > Referente del LUG San Fidenzio - http://www.lugsanfidenzio.org/ > Sviluppatore del progetto GEPAL - http://www.gepal.org/ > Home page: http://aldox86.blogspot.com/ -- Bob Doan <bd...@si...> |