Re: [Rlib-devel] This seems new: Variable Resolution: Assuming 0 value because rval is ERROR or NONE

[William K. V. <wk...@us...>]

Well I was curious as to why it felt that it had to substitute
zero for a valid expression.  I will admit to not having
read the code just yet.

On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:11, Bob Doan wrote:
> I could probably take that out.  It was for debugging
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 05:43 -0600, William K. Volkman wrote:
> > In array.xml there is this fragment:
> >         <Variables>
> >                 <Variable name="bo" value="2+3" type="expression"/>
> >         </Variables>
> > Which appears to be causing this message from pcode.c
> > Variable Resolution: Assuming 0 value because rval is ERROR or NONE
> > Due to the "amount" portion not being valid.  I don't recall
> > seeing this before, CVS update was done this evening, code was
> > introduced:
> > 
> > 2005-07-19  Bob Doan  <bd...@si...>
> >         * configure.in: 1.3.5
> >         * libsrc/pcode.c: Tweek the compiler again / Make variables less
> > picky and not crash on error
> > 
> > Is this doing what you expected?