Re: [Rlib-devel] add_function capability and pcode.h

[William K. V. <wk...@us...>]

The attached patch modifies Makefile.am to include pcode.h in the
list of installed header files.

On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 10:35 -0400, Bob Doan wrote:
> My vote is to install pcode.h because if you are going to to make custom
> RLIB functions you clearly know what you are doing and probably want
> thew full pcode stack
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:54 -0600, William K. Volkman wrote:
> > 	I notice that pcode.h is not installed in /usr/include/rlib
> > however to be able to write a function which can be "add"ed it
> > pretty much needs defined:
> > 
> > rlib_value_stack_pop
> > RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_STRING
> > RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_NUMBER
> > rlib_value_new_string
> > rlib_value_new_number
> > 
> > So should those definitions migrate to rlib.h or (the quickest)
> > add pcode.h to the list of installed headers.