Re: [Rlib-devel] add_function capability and pcode.h

[Bob D. <bd...@si...>]

My vote is to install pcode.h because if you are going to to make custom
RLIB functions you clearly know what you are doing and probably want
thew full pcode stack

- bob

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:54 -0600, William K. Volkman wrote:
> Hi,
> 	I notice that pcode.h is not installed in /usr/include/rlib
> however to be able to write a function which can be "add"ed it
> pretty much needs defined:
> 
> rlib_value_stack_pop
> RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_STRING
> RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_NUMBER
> rlib_value_new_string
> rlib_value_new_number
> 
> So should those definitions migrate to rlib.h or (the quickest)
> add pcode.h to the list of installed headers.
> 
> Thoughts/preferences?
> 
> Cheers,
> William.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Rlib-devel mailing list
> Rli...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-devel