From: William K. V. <wk...@us...> - 2005-06-12 19:32:29
|
Hello, Just an update. I added the check for the size of an image to the get_output_size routine, added a logo to the page footer, and now am seeing a double compensation for the size of the footer. On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 11:51, William K. Volkman wrote: <snip> > > On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 09:17, Bob Doan wrote: > > As of this moment things like this just won't work (And overwrites will > > occur) > > > > Perhaps the more correct thing to do execute hight changing properties > > before we check to see if "it will fit" > > Which is one reason why I put made the change to get_output_size, > it is called as part of the "will fit" check (see second stack > trace from GDB below). > > > I could tackle this one if you don't feel comfortable doing it. Let me > > know. > > I don't think that I'm familiar enough with the architecture to be in > a position to judge the "best" way to handle this. If you want to > tackle it that is fine by me. The change I made basically works in > the static case albeit not in the most efficient manner and didn't > add support for images (which is one change that I would make, logo > goes in the page footer). Take care, William. |