From: Bob D. <bd...@si...> - 2005-04-14 18:25:51
|
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 19:56 +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > Bob Doan =C3=ADrta: > >>>What is the license on the nl_langinfo stuff?=20 > >> > >>GPL > >=20 > >=20 > > Are you sure it's GPL?? nl_langinfo stuff in glibc is LGPL. Did you > > write this or did you get it from somewhere else? >=20 > Yes, I am certain. This code is part of the development version of > libextractor. http://gnunet.org/libextractor/ >=20 > Here's the patch that went into libextractor after the latest release: > http://www.mail-archive.com/gnu...@gn.../msg00184.html Hymmm.. Ok. But something is kinda odd here. GLIBC's nl_langinfo is LGPL. How can extractor relicense it under the GPL? This seems wrong to me. And I hate to have to go into all these details but the (c) stuff is really important to the company. I would rather be coding, trust me ;) > Today I mailed the signed copyright asignment via airmail. > I hope you receive it in a few days. Great >=20 > The attached patch fixes compile errors on MingW 3.2-rc3. > In Windows, the directory names must not end with directory separators. Ok >=20 > And the relink problem on "make install" is fixed if I modify ltmain.sh > so the only "need_relink=3Dyes" line is modified to "need_relink=3Dno" > after running autogen.sh. Perhaps we can automate this???? >=20 > Finally I was able to compile my rlibtest.c into rlibtest.exe. > It produces a very bad PDF. I set up the same data source on Windows > so it accesses the same dataset. >=20 Hym.. Sounds like a RPDF on windows problem. I'll try to build this whole thing tonight on my windows box and see how far I get. Could you send me both PDF's please thanks - bob |