Menu
▾
▴
riscosnet-users — RISC OS networking users mailing list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Joseph H. <jo...@he...> - 2007-09-02 10:39:37
|
Hi Rien, Rien Mertens wrote: > I am having problems posting or replying to newsgroups from my A9Home. > (RISC OS 4.42 kernel 8.68 flash2. > > I have Netfetch 3.03 with Newshound 1.5 and reader Messenger Pro 4.24 > > Using the same setup works from my RiscPC on the same Asus router. I think it's well known that this problem occurs on the A9home, but it seems there's no one who has access to an A9home and has the time/knowledge to debug it. Sorry I can't be more help... Joseph |
|
From: Rien M. <rie...@hc...> - 2007-08-19 11:17:16
|
I am having problems posting or replying to newsgroups from my A9Home. (RISC OS 4.42 kernel 8.68 flash2. I have Netfetch 3.03 with Newshound 1.5 and reader Messenger Pro 4.24 Using the same setup works from my RiscPC on the same Asus router. -- Rien Mertens Tweeberg 1 A 5246 XL Rosmalen 0031(0)736415517 |
|
From: Joseph H. <jo...@he...> - 2007-04-01 18:11:07
|
Darren Salt wrote:
> ----- Begin forwarded message -----
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:59:48 +0100
> From: Jeremy C B Nicoll <je...@bl...>
> To: Darren Salt <ds...@yo...>
> Subject: POPstar problems
>
> I've been using !POPstar 2.06-ds.5 under VRPC as part of my migration of
> email etc from RPC/Pluto to laptop/Gemini (allowing me to collect mail on
> the laptop then move the files to the RPC and read/answer some of it from
> that machine).
>
> Mostly it seems ok but every so often the POPstar log file shows an
> unexpected response to a DELE command. In all but one case there's nothing
> on the following line (assuming it is meant to be the unexpected response).
> For example:
>
> 26 Jan 00:17:56 060 Fetched 40 messages for
> win...@po..., synchronising with server
> 26 Jan 00:18:06 060 Fetched 80 messages for
> win...@po..., synchronising with server
> 26 Jan 00:18:16 060 Fetched 120 messages for
> win...@po..., synchronising with server
> 26 Jan 00:18:29 060 Fetched 160 messages for
> win...@po..., synchronising with server
> 26 Jan 00:18:42 030 Unexpected response to DELE command
> 26 Jan 00:18:42 030
> 26 Jan 00:18:42 060 Fetched 198 messages for
> win...@po...
You could try disabling pipelining ("MaxPipeSize" in the config file).
Joseph
|
|
From: Darren S. <ds...@yo...> - 2007-03-30 15:35:10
|
----- Begin forwarded message ----- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:59:48 +0100 From: Jeremy C B Nicoll <je...@bl...> To: Darren Salt <ds...@yo...> Subject: POPstar problems I've been using !POPstar 2.06-ds.5 under VRPC as part of my migration of email etc from RPC/Pluto to laptop/Gemini (allowing me to collect mail on the laptop then move the files to the RPC and read/answer some of it from that machine). Mostly it seems ok but every so often the POPstar log file shows an unexpected response to a DELE command. In all but one case there's nothing on the following line (assuming it is meant to be the unexpected response). For example: 26 Jan 00:17:56 060 Fetched 40 messages for win...@po..., synchronising with server 26 Jan 00:18:06 060 Fetched 80 messages for win...@po..., synchronising with server 26 Jan 00:18:16 060 Fetched 120 messages for win...@po..., synchronising with server 26 Jan 00:18:29 060 Fetched 160 messages for win...@po..., synchronising with server 26 Jan 00:18:42 030 Unexpected response to DELE command 26 Jan 00:18:42 030 26 Jan 00:18:42 060 Fetched 198 messages for win...@po... 30 Jan 14:01:46 060 Fetched 40 messages for jer...@po..., synchronising with server 30 Jan 14:01:48 030 Unexpected response to DELE command 30 Jan 14:01:48 030 30 Jan 14:01:48 060 Fetched 64 messages for jer...@po... 04 Feb 00:25:14 060 Fetched 12 messages for jer...@po... 04 Feb 00:25:20 030 Unexpected response to DELE command 04 Feb 00:25:20 030 . 04 Feb 00:25:20 060 Fetched 1 messages for win...@po... 04 Feb 00:25:46 060 Fetched 10 messages for win...@po... 04 Feb 00:42:20 060 Fetched 1 messages for ang...@po... 05 Feb 00:24:37 060 Fetched 40 messages for jer...@po..., synchronising with server 05 Feb 00:24:39 030 Unexpected response to DELE command 05 Feb 00:24:39 030 05 Feb 00:24:39 060 Fetched 48 messages for jer...@po... 05 Feb 00:25:09 060 Fetched 12 messages for jer...@po... Is there anything I can do to collect more info, eg changing a syslog option? I know (from experiments with a much modified copy of AntiSpam that I wrote for use on my RPC under RO 3.70) that socket handling doesn't work quite the same way under RO 4.39 and/or VRPC as it did on the older machine. Eg under VRPC I needed to close sockets explicitly in places where previously it wasn't needed, and some of the return-code checking changed because socket calls that worked returned non-zero (non-error) return codes where iirc under ro 3.70 they didn't return any status info. And in the logging my app's doing I see many instances of "would block" status coming back from calls that do eventually work if one waits long enough (or retries them? - I can't quite remember). I wouldn't be surprised though if my code is poor since it was based on someone-else's understanding of sockets... Anyway I wonder if you know if anyone else is using this version of POPstar under VRPC and if anyone else ha similar problems? Also, I've got several users/accounts defined but have to pick them off the Fetch-> menu one by one manually - just clicking on the fetch entry in the main menu doesn't seem to process them one by one as I think I thought it might do. Is there some option I have set wrongly? -- Jeremy C B Nicoll - my opinions are my own. ------ End forwarded message ------ -- | Darren Salt | d @ youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | nr. Ashington, | Toon | RISC OS, Linux | s zap,tartarus,org | Northumberland | Army | + At least 4000 million too many people. POPULATION LEVEL IS UNSUSTAINABLE. Good news crawls along. |
|
From: Anthony H. <aj...@ti...> - 2006-05-27 16:52:18
|
In message <200...@sc...>
ris...@li... wrote:
> RISCOSnet-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 136438
>
> We have received a request from 81.111.60.91 for subscription of your
> email address, <aj...@ti...>, to the
> ris...@li... mailing list. To confirm the
> request, please send a message to
> ris...@li..., and either:
>
> - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional "Re:" is
> ok),
>
> - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the
> message body:
>
confirm 136438
>
> (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email
> interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right
> form.)
>
> If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard
> this message. Send questions to
> ris...@li....
--
Anthony Hilton
aj...@ti...
|
|
From: Darren S. <ds...@yo...> - 2006-05-16 00:37:18
|
Due to Sourceforge's CVS problems over the past six weeks or so, they now have new servers. One of the effects is that the CVS repository's hostname has been changed. Instead of cvs.sourceforge.net, it's now riscosnet.cvs.sourceforge.net. (All other SF projects are similarly affected.) -- | Darren Salt | d @ youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | nr. Ashington, | Toon | RISC OS, Linux | s zap,tartarus,org | Northumberland | Army | + Use more efficient products. Use less. BE MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT. Force has no place where there is need of skill. |
|
From: Steve F. <li...@st...> - 2005-11-12 22:28:48
|
confirm 303097 |
|
From: Adam <li...@sn...> - 2005-10-29 21:08:53
|
On 29 Oct, Darren Salt <ds...@yo...> wrote: > I demand that Adam may or may not have written... > > And while I'm here - what about an external way of making POPStar > > perform a fetch/send? > > There appears to be - see c.riscnet and h.riscnet. Do you mean that I could modify the source code to achieve my request? Unfortunately I have precisely zero C knowledge so that's not going to provide me with a solution. Thanks, Adam -- Adam Richardson Carpe Diem http://www.snowstone.org.uk/riscos/ |
|
From: Darren S. <ds...@yo...> - 2005-10-29 20:27:54
|
I demand that Adam may or may not have written... > On 4 Sep, Adam <li...@sn...> wrote: >> In message <4DA091F304%s...@yo...uk> you wrote: >>> In message <286...@sn...> you wrote: >>>> - of course a better solution would be if you added a "send mail before >>>> shutdown" option!! >>> True :-) >> Ooh - does that mean you might implement it? :-) > And while I'm here - what about an external way of making POPStar perform a > fetch/send? There appears to be - see c.riscnet and h.riscnet. [snip] -- | Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | RISC OS, | ds...@yo... | Northumberland | Linux | ds...@za... | *Toon Army* | | Down with the Mackems! The probability of forgetting something is directly proportional to, er... |
|
From: Adam <li...@sn...> - 2005-10-29 20:05:44
|
On 4 Sep, Adam <li...@sn...> wrote: > In message <4DA091F304%s...@yo...uk> you wrote: > > > In message <286...@sn...> you wrote: > > > - of course a better solution would be if you added a "send mail before > > > shutdown" option!! > > > > True :-) > > Ooh - does that mean you might implement it? :-) And while I'm here - what about an external way of making POPStar perform a fetch/send? I don't have the iconbar on the icon but occasionally want to deliberately set POPStar going without waiting. At the moment I do this by quitting POPStar (from the task manager) then re-starting it, which seems a bit excessive. If there was some API for this, I'd write something to satify my needs (including the send-before-shutdown issue)... Cheers, Adam -- Adam Richardson Carpe Diem http://www.snowstone.org.uk/riscos/ |
|
From: Chris T. <chr...@nt...> - 2005-10-17 01:02:29
|
In message <200...@sc...>
ris...@li... wrote:
> RISCOSnet-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 990063
>
> We have received a request from 62.252.224.15 for subscription of your
> email address, <chr...@nt...>, to the
> ris...@li... mailing list. To confirm the
> request, please send a message to
> ris...@li..., and either:
>
> - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional "Re:" is
> ok),
>
> - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the
> message body:
>
> confirm 990063
>
> (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email
> interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right
> form.)
>
> If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard
> this message. Send questions to
> ris...@li....
--
*** Chris & Lee's Photodesk tutorials, tips and resources
*** http://www.photodesk.iconbar.com
*** Latest: Venus transit at http://www.roast.iconbar.com
|
|
From: Adam <li...@sn...> - 2005-09-04 19:42:00
|
In message <4DA091F304%s...@yo...uk> you wrote: > In message <286...@sn...> you wrote: > > > I've been fiddling around with POPStar (2.06-ds.5) and have discovered > > that it seems to act a little oddly with respect to Pre-Quit/Quit > > messages. In particular, if it's in the middle of a fetch/send when you > > choose shutdown, it just aborts & quits - shouldn't it give the nice > > little "are you sure you want to quit" window? > > It does. Huh. <red-faced> It's seems to be working fine here now. I can't remember how I was generating the problem before - I'll let you know if I manage to replicate it again. > > > And it should definitely not bring the shutdown process to a grinding halt. > > Why? It should - by responding to the prequit message iff a transfer is in > progress. And it does this. Yes, I think I was referring to the fact that it didn't set the shutdown process going again after it quit - but since I can't replicate my problem now, I can't be sure! > Although I see that you're using 4.39, which has a gratuitously-broken > WindowManager... Oh :-( And there was me expecting progress with an upgrade! In what particular ways is it broken? (Not got anything to do with strange plotting of sprites has it?) > > - of course a better solution would be if you added a "send mail before > > shutdown" option!! > > True :-) Ooh - does that mean you might implement it? :-) Adam -- Adam Richardson Carpe Diem http://www.snowstone.org.uk/riscos/ |
|
From: Adam <li...@sn...> - 2005-08-31 22:42:23
|
In message <200...@sc...>
ris...@li... wrote:
> RISCOSnet-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 772475
>
> We have received a request from 84.9.57.240 for subscription of your
> email address, <li...@sn...>, to the
> ris...@li... mailing list. To confirm the
> request, please send a message to
> ris...@li..., and either:
>
> - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional "Re:" is
> ok),
>
> - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the
> message body:
>
> confirm 772475
>
> (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email
> interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right
> form.)
>
> If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard
> this message. Send questions to
> ris...@li....
>
>
--
Adam Richardson
Carpe Diem
|
