[Rgdengine-developers] E answered note for note, relish for relish, And ran division with such ar

[Gathings H. <int...@il...>]

4] Therefore this play would seem to have been acted at the Whitefriars,
i.e. at the Salisbury Court theatre. (F.G. Fleay.) [85] The "jig" seems
to have been a comic after-piece consisting of music and dancing. In Mr.
Collier's _Hist. of Dram. Lit_., iii. 180-85 (new ed.), the reader will
find much curious information on the point. The following passage from
Shirley's _Love in a Maze_ (1632) is not noticed by Mr. Collier:-- "Many
gentlemen Are not, as in the days of understanding, Now satisfied
without a jig, which since They cannot, with their honour, call for
after The Play, they look to be serv'd up in the middle: Your dance is
the best language of some comedies And footing runs away with all; a
scene Express'd with life of art and squared to nature Is dull and
phlegmatic poetry." --Works (ed. Gifford and Dyce), ii. 339. [86] MS.
him. [87] The name of the musician, I suppose; but the reading of the
MS. is somewhat illegible. [88] The passage at first ran as follows:
"Umh, how long have I slept, or am I buried and walke in Elizium as the
poets faine? Goe to, where are they? in the ayre? I can percieve nothing
nor remember anything has been don or said!" [89] '_Grimes_. Soe, now
retire a little. Ile play him one fitt of mirthe on my trebble to rouse
him. _Ext_.' These words occur in the left-hand margin. Probably they
should stand here in the text 'Ext.' may mean either '_exeunt_'
(musicians) or '_exit_' (_Grimes_ to disguise himself). [90] 'Who are
these! ha! the towne waits? why, how now, my masters, whats the matter,
ha?'--Passage cancelled in MS. [91] 'Bakside' is a correction (in the
MS.) for 'buttock.' [92] "Here Gent[lemen], share this amongst yee and
pray for Grimes." These words (addressed to the musicians) follow in the
MS. but have been scored through. [93] The MS. gives "aurescion." [94]
The reading of the MS. seems to be "inuolute." Mr. Fleay suggests
"invocate." [95] The repetition of 'loath' in the next line is
suspicious. [96] T