[rs-users] RE: [Litestep] Re: lsdev: source code permission request

[Mudiaga O. <ob...@in...>]

 > I would like to ask the users to not post 
 > anything else to this mailing list about this project. 

Exactly, if you want to keep informed on retrostep, 
there are three retrostep mailing lists and 
there must be one that suits your information
needs. Please visit http://rs.obada.com/lists.html

 > I would like all references to LiteStep removed 
 > from said shell

This request ist probably based on unconstrutive thinking.
If you are a module developer or an lsdev (most of you 
have not spoken), you probably should read my response 
which you can find in the retrostep-devel mailing list 
archives at http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=44038

I may have made mistakes while dealing with people I didn't 
know well, and caused a lot of inconvenience I wish never
happened. I'm sorry for that.  Now I think it's time to 
accept the consequences and look forward.

At any rate, I hope people will come foward who also think 
that having a drop-in alternative to litestep is a good 
thing, and be motivated to help see Retrostep (retro 
in particular) actually move foward. 

Now to some other points in a different light:

  If you are making a theme and it isn't working, 
    try another "Litestep".
  If you are writing a module and it is behaving strange,
    try another "Litestep".
  If your binaries from yesterday don't work today,
    try another "Litestep".

     -- From the song "Litestep or litestep" 
        Available in stores near you!


  Also, I'll say something that you might either
  find funny or offending. I just noticed that I've been 
  very quick to use the word "forward" (it being the 
  opposite of "retro"). I just thought about what the 
  opposite of "lite" would be, and in computing terms, 
  I would say it's "bloat".
  Strange... 
 
  It might be fun to someday ask the creative ones among 
  you to come up with sentences that contain the words 
  "retro", "forward", "lite", and "bloat"....

~Mudi