Menu
▾
▴
resteasy-developers
|
From: Bill B. <bb...@re...> - 2008-04-07 18:23:43
|
Christian,
It doesn't work already?
Can't you do:
@ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
@GET
public String getMe() {}
Or do you mean something else?
FYI, to subscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
Christian Sadilek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> are there any plans to support MIME properties for XML content
> negotiation in RESTeasy like you described in your Blog
> http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/03/05/restful-xml-content-negotitation?
>
> I would like to expose two different xml representations of a resource
> and the solution you presented would fit perfectly.
>
> Thank you!
>
> I hope it's o.k. to send you this email directly. I could not find a
> user forum.
>
> kind regards,
> Christian Sadilek
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
|
|
From: Bill B. <bb...@re...> - 2008-04-09 18:56:14
|
Ok, this is fixed in trunk/ I'm traveling the next week, so I won't be
able to do another release in 2 weeks or so. Please check out trunk if
you want this bug fix.
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
> Ok, thanks. I'll take a look sometime today and put out a patch
> tomorrow. I think I'm just not matching on properties. I thought I
> was, guess not.
>
> Christian Sadilek wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> thanks for your reply. this is exactly what I tried to do:
>>
>> I have the following 4 methods:
>> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
>> @GET
>> public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
>> return "<foo>"+objectId+"</foo>";
>> }
>>
>> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
>> @GET
>> public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
>> return "<bar>"+objectId+"</bar>";
>> }
>>
>> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
>> @PUT
>> public void putMeFoo(String xml) {
>> System.out.println("foo");
>> }
>>
>> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
>> @PUT
>> public void putMeBar(String xml) {
>> System.out.println("bar");
>> }
>>
>> I used the same annotations on the client interface and created it using
>> the ProxyFactory.
>> @GET
>> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
>> public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
>>
>> @GET
>> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
>> public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
>>
>> @PUT
>> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
>> public void putMeFoo(String xml);
>>
>> @PUT
>> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
>> public void putMeBar(String xml);
>>
>> However, only the "foo methods" are called (even if I call getMeBar() or
>> putMeBar()). I tried it with beta1 and beta2.
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> As far as I was able to trace the problem I end up with 4 different
>> uriParamChildren in the root PathSegmentNode. 2 for GET and
>> 2 for PUT. The first one to be analyzed in
>> PathSegmentNode.findResourceInvoker always wins because the media types
>> are compatible as MediaType.isCompatible() "only" checks for the type
>> and subtype (not for any mime properties).
>>
>> Thanks again for your help.
>>
>> king regards,
>> Christian Sadilek
>>
>> 2008/4/7, Bill Burke <bb...@re... <mailto:bb...@re...>>:
>>
>> Sorry, that should be
>>
>> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
>> @PUT
>> public void putMe(String xml) {}
>>
>>
>> Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>> Christian,
>>
>> It doesn't work already?
>>
>> Can't you do:
>>
>> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
>> @GET
>> public String getMe() {}
>>
>> Or do you mean something else?
>>
>>
>> FYI, to subscribe:
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
>>
>>
>>
>> Christian Sadilek wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> are there any plans to support MIME properties for XML
>> content negotiation in RESTeasy like you described in your
>> Blog
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/03/05/restful-xml-content-negotitation?
>>
>> I would like to expose two different xml representations of
>> a resource and the solution you presented would fit perfectly.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> I hope it's o.k. to send you this email directly. I could
>> not find a user forum.
>>
>> kind regards,
>> Christian Sadilek
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>
>>
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
|
|
From: Christian S. <chr...@gm...> - 2008-04-10 12:16:34
|
Hi Bill,
thanks I have checked out the latest version and it works now.
regards,
Christian
2008/4/9, Bill Burke <bb...@re...>:
>
> Ok, this is fixed in trunk/ I'm traveling the next week, so I won't be
> able to do another release in 2 weeks or so. Please check out trunk if you
> want this bug fix.
>
> Bill
>
> Bill Burke wrote:
>
> > Ok, thanks. I'll take a look sometime today and put out a patch
> > tomorrow. I think I'm just not matching on properties. I thought I was,
> > guess not.
> >
> > Christian Sadilek wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > thanks for your reply. this is exactly what I tried to do:
> > >
> > > I have the following 4 methods:
> > > @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > @GET
> > > public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
> > > return "<foo>"+objectId+"</foo>";
> > > }
> > >
> > > @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> > > @GET
> > > public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
> > > return "<bar>"+objectId+"</bar>";
> > > }
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > @PUT
> > > public void putMeFoo(String xml) {
> > > System.out.println("foo");
> > > }
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> > > @PUT
> > > public void putMeBar(String xml) {
> > > System.out.println("bar");
> > > }
> > > I used the same annotations on the client interface and created it
> > > using the ProxyFactory.
> > > @GET
> > > @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
> > >
> > > @GET
> > > @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> > > public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
> > > @PUT
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > public void putMeFoo(String xml);
> > > @PUT
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> > > public void putMeBar(String xml);
> > > However, only the "foo methods" are called (even if I call
> > > getMeBar() or putMeBar()). I tried it with beta1 and beta2.
> > > Am I doing something wrong?
> > >
> > > As far as I was able to trace the problem I end up with 4 different
> > > uriParamChildren in the root PathSegmentNode. 2 for GET and
> > > 2 for PUT. The first one to be analyzed in
> > > PathSegmentNode.findResourceInvoker always wins because the media types are
> > > compatible as MediaType.isCompatible() "only" checks for the type and
> > > subtype (not for any mime properties).
> > >
> > > Thanks again for your help.
> > >
> > > king regards,
> > > Christian Sadilek
> > >
> > > 2008/4/7, Bill Burke <bb...@re... <mailto:bb...@re...>>:
> > >
> > > Sorry, that should be
> > >
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > @PUT
> > > public void putMe(String xml) {}
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Burke wrote:
> > >
> > > Christian,
> > >
> > > It doesn't work already?
> > >
> > > Can't you do:
> > >
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > @GET
> > > public String getMe() {}
> > >
> > > Or do you mean something else?
> > >
> > >
> > > FYI, to subscribe:
> > >
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Christian Sadilek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > are there any plans to support MIME properties for XML
> > > content negotiation in RESTeasy like you described in your
> > > Blog
> > >
> > > http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/03/05/restful-xml-content-negotitation
> > > ?
> > >
> > > I would like to expose two different xml representations of
> > > a resource and the solution you presented would fit
> > > perfectly.
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > >
> > > I hope it's o.k. to send you this email directly. I could
> > > not find a user forum.
> > >
> > > kind regards,
> > > Christian Sadilek
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Bill Burke
> > > JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> > > http://bill.burkecentral.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
|
|
From: Bill B. <bb...@re...> - 2008-04-07 18:30:56
|
Sorry, that should be
@ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
@PUT
public void putMe(String xml) {}
Bill Burke wrote:
> Christian,
>
> It doesn't work already?
>
> Can't you do:
>
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> @GET
> public String getMe() {}
>
> Or do you mean something else?
>
>
> FYI, to subscribe:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
>
>
>
> Christian Sadilek wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> are there any plans to support MIME properties for XML content
>> negotiation in RESTeasy like you described in your Blog
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/03/05/restful-xml-content-negotitation?
>>
>> I would like to expose two different xml representations of a resource
>> and the solution you presented would fit perfectly.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> I hope it's o.k. to send you this email directly. I could not find a
>> user forum.
>>
>> kind regards,
>> Christian Sadilek
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
|
|
From: Bill B. <bb...@re...> - 2008-04-08 12:24:53
|
Ok, thanks. I'll take a look sometime today and put out a patch
tomorrow. I think I'm just not matching on properties. I thought I
was, guess not.
Christian Sadilek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> thanks for your reply. this is exactly what I tried to do:
>
> I have the following 4 methods:
> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> @GET
> public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
> return "<foo>"+objectId+"</foo>";
> }
>
> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> @GET
> public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
> return "<bar>"+objectId+"</bar>";
> }
>
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> @PUT
> public void putMeFoo(String xml) {
> System.out.println("foo");
> }
>
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> @PUT
> public void putMeBar(String xml) {
> System.out.println("bar");
> }
>
> I used the same annotations on the client interface and created it using
> the ProxyFactory.
> @GET
> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
>
> @GET
> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
>
> @PUT
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> public void putMeFoo(String xml);
>
> @PUT
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> public void putMeBar(String xml);
>
> However, only the "foo methods" are called (even if I call getMeBar() or
> putMeBar()). I tried it with beta1 and beta2.
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> As far as I was able to trace the problem I end up with 4 different
> uriParamChildren in the root PathSegmentNode. 2 for GET and
> 2 for PUT. The first one to be analyzed in
> PathSegmentNode.findResourceInvoker always wins because the media types
> are compatible as MediaType.isCompatible() "only" checks for the type
> and subtype (not for any mime properties).
>
> Thanks again for your help.
>
> king regards,
> Christian Sadilek
>
> 2008/4/7, Bill Burke <bb...@re... <mailto:bb...@re...>>:
>
> Sorry, that should be
>
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> @PUT
> public void putMe(String xml) {}
>
>
> Bill Burke wrote:
>
> Christian,
>
> It doesn't work already?
>
> Can't you do:
>
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> @GET
> public String getMe() {}
>
> Or do you mean something else?
>
>
> FYI, to subscribe:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
>
>
>
> Christian Sadilek wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> are there any plans to support MIME properties for XML
> content negotiation in RESTeasy like you described in your
> Blog
> http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/03/05/restful-xml-content-negotitation?
>
> I would like to expose two different xml representations of
> a resource and the solution you presented would fit perfectly.
>
> Thank you!
>
> I hope it's o.k. to send you this email directly. I could
> not find a user forum.
>
> kind regards,
> Christian Sadilek
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
|
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X