Re: [Resteasy-users] 答复: Changing Default JSON Time Format with RESTEasy 3.x

[Ian A. <ins...@gm...>]

I ended up posting this on stackover flow for advice, and I got back a
really complete answer:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19229341/changing-default-json-time-format-with-resteasy-3-x
.

The only issue is that I think there is a bug in RESTEasy 3.x that prevents
this from working, seeing that it works perfectly in RESTEasy 2.3.5.  I
filed a bug with JBoss to track this issue.


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:59 PM, 刘日新 <liu...@li...> wrote:

>  Why not add an extra field which hold  value of timezone?****
>
> ** **
>
> *发件人:* Ian Anderson [mailto:ins...@gm...]
> *发送时间:* 2013年10月8日 2:42
> *收件人:* res...@li...
> *主题:* [Resteasy-users] Changing Default JSON Time Format with RESTEasy 3.x
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> I am using RESTEasy to implement a REST Service using JSON serialization.
> Currently, Dates are getting serialized to milliseconds since 1970.  To
> improve compatibility, I would like to get my dates into one of two
> formats; milliseconds + timezone offset or ISO 8061.****
>
> It seems that RESTEasy used to use Jettison for JSON serialization, but
> from what I've been reading they've switch to Jackson ... all of this has
> made googling for help pretty hit or miss.****
>
> From what I can tell, I need to implement a ContextResolver<ObjectMapper>
> along the lines of:****
>
>         public class JacksonConfig impelments ContextResolver<ObjectMapper>
>         {
>             private final OBjectMapper objectMapper;****
>
>             public JacksonConfig() throws Exception
>             {
>                 objectMapper = new ObjectMapper.configure(
>
> SerializationFeature.WRITE_DATE_AS_TIMESTAMPS, false);
>             }****
>
>             @Override
>             public ObjectMapper getContext(Class<?> arg0)
>             {
>                 return objectMapper;
>             }
>          }****
>
> The thing I haven't been able to find, is what do I do with this?  Where
> do I put it?****
>
> So the larger questions are, am I heading in the right direction and are
> my assumptions correct?
> ****
>
> Thanks!****
>
>
> --
> Ian****
>



-- 
Ian T. W. Anderson