Re: [Resteasy-developers] REST implementation?

[Solomon D. <sd...@gm...>]

I'd use CXF only if I had to support both SOAP and REST calls.  On the +
side for RESTEasy: client implementation and spring integration.


On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:13 AM, <hol...@no...> wrote:

>  Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> I can’t say anything about CXF, but for me the biggest advantage of
> RESTeasy vs. Jersey is that RESTeasy can handle annotations on interfaces.
> Jersery won’t find those.****
>
> ** **
>
> Holger****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Navindian [mailto:nav...@gm...]
> *Sent:* Sonntag, 5. Mai 2013 18:12
> *To:* res...@li...
> *Subject:* [Resteasy-developers] REST implementation?****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi****
>
> ** **
>
> I am currently developing my data services using following technologies.**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> 1. Axis2 REST****
>
> 2. Spring****
>
> 3. Hibernate****
>
> ** **
>
> I wish to replace AXIS 2 with the following:****
>
> 1. Jersey****
>
> 2. RESTeasy****
>
> 3. CXF****
>
> ** **
>
> Can anyone tell me which one i have to choose and why?****
>
> ** **
>
> thanks****
>
> jyothi****
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
> Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
> Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
> _______________________________________________
> Resteasy-developers mailing list
> Res...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
>
>