Re: [Resteasy-developers] resteasy-jackson-provider question

[Michael P. <mpa...@re...>]

Hi Weinan,

On 10/21/2012 10:23 AM, Weinan Li wrote:
> Hi Michael, 
> 
> Could you please provide more details on your requirements?

We model our api in the xsd, then generating java code from it,
the problem is when we create java from the schema, jaxb using java naming
convention when creating fields, but applying @XmlElement annotations to
preserve the original names, later when:

- xml generated, it uses @XmlElement annotation names
- when json generated it uses field names

what is creating naming inconsistency between xml and json representations.

    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.jboss.resteasy</groupId>
      <artifactId>resteasy-jackson-provider</artifactId>
      <version>${resteasy.version}</version>


<resteasy.version>2.3.2.Final</resteasy.version>
<maven-jaxb22-plugin.version>0.8.1</maven-jaxb22-plugin.version>


> 
> -- 
> Weinan Li
> JBoss, Red Hat
> 
> On Sunday, October 21, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any way making jackson-provider using @XmlElement names
>> rather than field's?
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Michael Pasternak
>> RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
>> _______________________________________________
>> Resteasy-developers mailing list
>> Res...@li... <mailto:Res...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
> 


-- 

Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D