Re: [Resteasy-developers] object defaults

[Bill B. <bb...@re...>]

Ok, but not until next release.  I want to release on Monday and begin 
the TCK work.

Michael Brackx wrote:
> @DefaultValue(DefaultPojo.class) ?
> Probably not that useful.
> 
> @DefaultValue(DefaultPojoFactory.class) ?
> 
> @DefaultValue(useProvider = true)
> @DefaultValue()
> and a new provider interface ?
> 
> public interface DefaultValueProvider<T> {
>   T get();
> }
> 
> Michael Brackx
> 
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Bill Burke <bb...@re...> wrote:
>>
>> Michael Brackx wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Bill Burke <bb...@re...> wrote:
>>>> I looked at the code and it seems that the @DefaultValue is run through
>>>> the
>>>> converter.  Are you not seeing that behavior?
>>> Yes i do (actually, i added a test case for that)
>>> What i meant is not specifying the default as string, but as an object.
>>>
>>> @DefaultValue(new Pojo("default"))
>>>
>>> otherwise you would need to convert the value yourself
>>>
>>> @DefaultValue(new PojoStingConverter().toString(new Pojo("default")))
>>>
>> Both are illegal.  You can only use primitive constants within annotations
>> as they are compiled directly into the bytecode.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com