Re: [Resteasy-developers] [seam-dev] Seam and RESTEasy integration

[Pete M. <pet...@jb...>]

On 13 Jul 2008, at 15:22, Christian Bauer wrote:

>
> On Jul 13, 2008, at 16:12 , Pete Muir wrote:
>
>>> 3. We'll probably have a mechanism for transporting conversation  
>>> identifiers in HTTP headers. However, I'm thinking that the way  
>>> this should be implemented is with explicit automatically created  
>>> resources that identify a particular conversation "workspace". See  
>>> Bill's blog about JMS integration and how you'd model a  
>>> transaction resource RESTfully. This is the same approach just for  
>>> Seam conversations.
>>
>> So this would be similar to named conversations? You have to  
>> explicitly define and use a conversation?
>
> Yes, it's the same concept. You do a first request to create the  
> conversation workspace under a resource path like /rest/conversation/ 
> editItem and then have sub-resources, like PUT a new representation  
> to /rest/conversation/editItem/123. Shouldn't be difficult, the  
> tricky part is the resource design.

Good :-)

> Bill summarized the problem and possible solutions here:
>
> http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/06/16/resteasy-mom-an-exercise-in-jax-rs-restful-ws-design/
>
>> I assume you would build (4) on (5)?
>
> Well, I'm going to commit (1) and (2) and then let others have a  
> look :) I think Shane should be involved at some point because he  
> knows the current remoting/WS stuff best.
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> sea...@li...
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete