Re: [Resteasy-developers] Failure == SC_BAD_REQUEST?

[Martin A. <sp...@ma...>]

On 9 Jul 2008, at 00:35, Bill Burke wrote:

> 2) I believe, after looking at those broken tests, that I ported the  
> test from Jersey's testsuite.  This means that we might have to  
> change the behavior back to the way it was.  We'll see what happens  
> with the TCK.


I've reverted back so that we're once again getting 400 when we  
encounter bad numbers. This means I've changed the test suites back as  
well.

So currently Ryan does not get a 404 for the resource method taking an  
integer.

M