Re: [Resteasy-developers] SC_OK or SC_NO_CONTENT

[Bill B. <bb...@re...>]

Ok, this is fixed in SVN head and will be released sometime next week. 
FYI, I'm pretty sure @POST is supposed to return 204 on void/null entity 
as well.

JXrgen Zimmermann wrote:
> Inside a Resource's method annotated with @DELETE I'm producing the
> response this way:
> return Response.ok().build();
> 
> Resteasy returns to the client: SC_OK (= 200)
> Jersey returns to the client:   SC_NO_CONTENT (= 204)
> 
> Hmm, so which response is the right one?
> 
> -- Juergen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Resteasy-developers mailing list
> Res...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com