|
From: Christian S. <chr...@gm...> - 2008-04-10 12:16:34
|
Hi Bill,
thanks I have checked out the latest version and it works now.
regards,
Christian
2008/4/9, Bill Burke <bb...@re...>:
>
> Ok, this is fixed in trunk/ I'm traveling the next week, so I won't be
> able to do another release in 2 weeks or so. Please check out trunk if you
> want this bug fix.
>
> Bill
>
> Bill Burke wrote:
>
> > Ok, thanks. I'll take a look sometime today and put out a patch
> > tomorrow. I think I'm just not matching on properties. I thought I was,
> > guess not.
> >
> > Christian Sadilek wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > thanks for your reply. this is exactly what I tried to do:
> > >
> > > I have the following 4 methods:
> > > @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > @GET
> > > public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
> > > return "<foo>"+objectId+"</foo>";
> > > }
> > >
> > > @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> > > @GET
> > > public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
> > > return "<bar>"+objectId+"</bar>";
> > > }
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > @PUT
> > > public void putMeFoo(String xml) {
> > > System.out.println("foo");
> > > }
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> > > @PUT
> > > public void putMeBar(String xml) {
> > > System.out.println("bar");
> > > }
> > > I used the same annotations on the client interface and created it
> > > using the ProxyFactory.
> > > @GET
> > > @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
> > >
> > > @GET
> > > @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> > > public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
> > > @PUT
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > public void putMeFoo(String xml);
> > > @PUT
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> > > public void putMeBar(String xml);
> > > However, only the "foo methods" are called (even if I call
> > > getMeBar() or putMeBar()). I tried it with beta1 and beta2.
> > > Am I doing something wrong?
> > >
> > > As far as I was able to trace the problem I end up with 4 different
> > > uriParamChildren in the root PathSegmentNode. 2 for GET and
> > > 2 for PUT. The first one to be analyzed in
> > > PathSegmentNode.findResourceInvoker always wins because the media types are
> > > compatible as MediaType.isCompatible() "only" checks for the type and
> > > subtype (not for any mime properties).
> > >
> > > Thanks again for your help.
> > >
> > > king regards,
> > > Christian Sadilek
> > >
> > > 2008/4/7, Bill Burke <bb...@re... <mailto:bb...@re...>>:
> > >
> > > Sorry, that should be
> > >
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > @PUT
> > > public void putMe(String xml) {}
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Burke wrote:
> > >
> > > Christian,
> > >
> > > It doesn't work already?
> > >
> > > Can't you do:
> > >
> > > @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> > > @GET
> > > public String getMe() {}
> > >
> > > Or do you mean something else?
> > >
> > >
> > > FYI, to subscribe:
> > >
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Christian Sadilek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > are there any plans to support MIME properties for XML
> > > content negotiation in RESTeasy like you described in your
> > > Blog
> > >
> > > http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/03/05/restful-xml-content-negotitation
> > > ?
> > >
> > > I would like to expose two different xml representations of
> > > a resource and the solution you presented would fit
> > > perfectly.
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > >
> > > I hope it's o.k. to send you this email directly. I could
> > > not find a user forum.
> > >
> > > kind regards,
> > > Christian Sadilek
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Bill Burke
> > > JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> > > http://bill.burkecentral.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
|