Re: [Resteasy-developers] RESTeasy XML content negotiation

[Bill B. <bb...@re...>]

Ok, thanks.  I'll take a look sometime today and put out a patch 
tomorrow.  I think I'm just not matching on properties.  I thought I 
was, guess not.

Christian Sadilek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> 
> thanks for your reply. this is exactly what I tried to do:
> 
> I have the following 4 methods:
> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> @GET
> public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
>   return "<foo>"+objectId+"</foo>";
> }
> 
> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> @GET
> public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId) {
>   return "<bar>"+objectId+"</bar>";
> }
>    
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> @PUT
> public void putMeFoo(String xml) {
>   System.out.println("foo");
> }
>    
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> @PUT
> public void putMeBar(String xml) {
>   System.out.println("bar");
> }
>    
> I used the same annotations on the client interface and created it using 
> the ProxyFactory.
> @GET
> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> public String getMeFoo(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
> 
> @GET
> @ProduceMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> public String getMeBar(@PathParam("obj-id") int objectId);
>    
> @PUT
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
> public void putMeFoo(String xml);
>    
> @PUT
> @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=bar")
> public void putMeBar(String xml);
>    
> However, only the "foo methods" are called (even if I call getMeBar() or 
> putMeBar()). I tried it with beta1 and beta2.
> Am I doing something wrong?
> 
> As far as I was able to trace the problem I end up with 4 different 
> uriParamChildren in the root PathSegmentNode. 2 for GET and
> 2 for PUT. The first one to be analyzed in 
> PathSegmentNode.findResourceInvoker always wins because the media types 
> are compatible as MediaType.isCompatible() "only" checks for the type 
> and subtype (not for any mime properties).
> 
> Thanks again for your help.
> 
> king regards,
> Christian Sadilek
> 
> 2008/4/7, Bill Burke <bb...@re... <mailto:bb...@re...>>:
> 
>     Sorry, that should be
> 
>     @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
>     @PUT
>     public void putMe(String xml) {}
> 
> 
>     Bill Burke wrote:
> 
>         Christian,
> 
>         It doesn't work already?
> 
>         Can't you do:
> 
>         @ConsumeMime("application/xml;schema=foo")
>         @GET
>         public String getMe() {}
> 
>         Or do you mean something else?
> 
> 
>         FYI, to subscribe:
>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-developers
> 
> 
> 
>         Christian Sadilek wrote:
> 
>             Hi Bill,
> 
>             are there any plans to support MIME properties for XML
>             content negotiation in RESTeasy like you described in your
>             Blog
>             http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/03/05/restful-xml-content-negotitation?
> 
>             I would like to expose two different xml representations of
>             a resource and the solution you presented would fit perfectly.
> 
>             Thank you!
> 
>             I hope it's o.k. to send you this email directly. I could
>             not find a user forum.
> 
>             kind regards,
>             Christian Sadilek
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Bill Burke
>     JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>     http://bill.burkecentral.com
> 
> 

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com