Re: [Rest2web-develop] rest2web and ConfigObj

[Michael F. <mi...@pc...>]

Nicola Larosa wrote:
>>>I've implemented (and checked in) defaults as discussed. I've done one
>>>test - more appreciated ;-)
>>>
>>>It uses the 'default' keyword in checks, and adds a new attribute
>>>'defaults' on sections.
>>>
>>>If a keyword is missing but a default is supplied, then the default is
>>>used. (The default *is* still passed to the check so that type
>>>conversion can be done).
> 
> 
> Here, in validate.py, you were using the "pop" method of dicts. Alas, it
> was introduced in Python 2.3, so it broke compatibility with Python 2.2 .
> 
> Moreover, there was a naked except: clause in ConfigObj.validate that
> silenced the exception (*never* use naked except: clauses).
> 
> I fixed both problems, maybe not in the cleanest way, see the code. All
> tests pass once again on Python 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 .
> 

Brilliant by the way..... Nice one.

Regards,

Fuzzy
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python