[Rest2web-develop] Docs - latest commit

[Michael F. <mi...@pc...>]

I've just done a commit. I've checked in the cleaned up your cleaned up
version of the docs for validate and configobj. So at least they are now
in SVN. I've not done any real work yet.

Nicola Larosa wrote:

>>Yes - API generation is an interesting subject which I'd like to work on
>>sometimes. Preferably an answer integrated with docutils in some way or
>>other.
>>    
>>
>
>That would be better, but at least Epydoc can read ReST.
>
>  
>
Yeah... unfortunately it looks like there is no new work on Epydoc,
which is worrying for the future.

>  
>
>>There are Epydoc generated docs for ConfigObj 3 online (and in the
>>distro) - and I imagine we'll do the same for ConfigObj 4.
>>    
>>
>
>Great.
>
>
>  
>
>>>More polishing, eh? I'll see what I can do...
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>Well.... a regex test mechanism is more than polishing (it has to be
>>extensible).
>>
>>Also I suspect timestamp is non trivial but possible.
>>    
>>
>
>Sure, in their own right they're not trivial, but in the Big Validation
>Picture, they could appear as polish, maybe. :-)
>
>
>  
>
Oh - you mean 'coz I've already done all the real work ;-)

>>>P.S.: are you still using, and fixing, DrPython? ;-D
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>No... SPE is my current IDE. I doubt I will do any development on it
>>though, just with it. I'm growing to appreciate it more and more..
>>    
>>
>
>Yesterday I was looking for Python IDEs (Eric3 is good but its development
>is not particularly open), looked at DrPython, but summarily dismissed SPE,
>I don't remember why anymore. I'll have another look at it.
>
>
>  
>
Right - before this IDLE was my IDE, so I'm probably not used to using
some of the features you would take for granted.

Best Regards,

Fuzzy
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python