remix-devel — Development of and with libremix

[remix-devel] remix moved to svn.metadecks.org

[Conrad P. <co...@me...>]

Hi,

I've moved libremix out of CVS (cvs.sourceforge.net) into a new
subversion repository. You can check it out by:

  svn co http://svn.metadecks.org/libremix/trunk libremix

svn.metadecks.org can also be browsed via trac at:

  http://trac.metadecks.org/

trac also integrates bug reporting and a simple wiki. It's very cool,
as it automatically picks up links between commit messages and bug
reports.

Accordingly I've also disabled the trackers on Sourceforge (bug reporting,
support/feature requests), disabled Sourceforge CVS, and updated the
libremix web page (http://www.metadecks.org/software/remix/) with the
new svn info.

cheers,

Conrad.

Re: [remix-devel] libremix

[Erik de C. L. <eri...@me...>]

Yury Aliaev wrote:

> Some times ago I tried this. First, the code is too old and requires gcc 
> no more than 2.96 to be compilled. I've failed with 3.2.1. 

I just compiled the code from CVS with gcc-3.4 and it compiled 
without a problem. This was on my iBook running Debian Linux.

> Second, this 
> library is good enough for games and demos, because can produce sound in 
> the real time from scratch, that is using simple set of commands and 
> samples. For use in sound processors and musical editors I guess this 
> library is to be extended, it should allow to render sound fragments of 
> the given time into buffers, not directly to sound card device. I'm 
> planning to try combine it with Soundtracker after I'll have completed 
> porting ST to gtk+-2 interface.

Thanks for your input Yury.

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo  no...@me... (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"Even Napoleon had his Watergate" -- Michael Spautz

Re: [remix-devel] libremix

[Yury A. <mu...@ra...>]

Hi, Erik!
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm new to the list. I wondering what people are using libremix
> for. Experiences good or bad? Things that work well etc.
> 

Some times ago I tried this. First, the code is too old and requires gcc 
no more than 2.96 to be compilled. I've failed with 3.2.1. Second, this 
library is good enough for games and demos, because can produce sound in 
the real time from scratch, that is using simple set of commands and 
samples. For use in sound processors and musical editors I guess this 
library is to be extended, it should allow to render sound fragments of 
the given time into buffers, not directly to sound card device. I'm 
planning to try combine it with Soundtracker after I'll have completed 
porting ST to gtk+-2 interface.

Cheers,
Yury.

[remix-devel] libremix

[Erik de C. L. <eri...@me...>]

Hi all,

I'm new to the list. I wondering what people are using libremix
for. Experiences good or bad? Things that work well etc.

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo  no...@me... (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"Having a firewall that allows NFS to the Internet is like having a
seat belt that lets your head touch the dashboard." -- Marcus Ranum

[remix-devel] Remix compiling

[Yury A. <mu...@ra...>]

Hi Conrad,

Recently I've been playnig with Remix first time... Because I'm going to 
accomodate it as tracker engine. Of course, the main questions are still 
to ask. But I already have a trouble when compilling it. First, remix 
doesn't want to compole with modern gcc (versions 3.x). You may check 
this yourself to find what happens. Second, when I turned gcc to 2.96, 
the compilation failed twice because of wrong header paths: first time I 
had to copy (or link) ctxdata.h file to remix-0.2.3/include/remix 
directory, and second time -- I'd to copy it again to 
remix-0.2.3/include directory (when compilling examples). After than the 
compilation had finished at least :) And anyway, the library seems to be 
a very cool stuff :))) Thanks!

Yury.

[remix-devel] FASD project: Online survey launched

[<ben...@id...>]

Dear Open Source developer

I am doing a research project on "Fun and Software Development" in which I kindly invite you to participate.
You will find the online survey under http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/. The questionnaire consists of 53 questions and you will need about 15 minutes to complete it.

With the FASD project (Fun and Software Development) we want to define the motivational significance of fun when software developers decide to engage in Open Source projects. What is special about our research project is that a similar survey is planned with software developers in commercial firms. This procedure allows the immediate comparison between the involved individuals and the conditions of production of these two development models. Thus we hope to obtain substantial new insights to the phenomenon of Open Source Development.


With many thanks for your participation,
Benno Luthiger


PS:
The results of the survey will be published under http://www.isu.unizh.ch/fuehrung/blprojects/FASD/.
We have set up the mailing list fa...@we... for this study. Please see http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/mailinglist_en.html for registration to this mailing list.

_______________________________________________________________________

Benno Luthiger
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
8092 Zurich

Mail: benno.luthiger(at)id.ethz.ch
_______________________________________________________________________

[remix-devel] cvs updated

[Conrad P. <co...@me...>]

Hey,

I've pushed a bunch of recent changes to fix build problems etc. up into
remix cvs. Feel free to test it out :) It should at the very least build
cleanly on both linux and osx.

let me know if it breaks for you ...

K.

[Remix-devel] 0.2.3 compile

[Tim H. <th...@ho...>]

I admit that this is an older system, but here's what I am getting with
0.2.3:

First, it looks for 'aclocal-1.4' and 'automake-1.4'.  I have them, but they
were not named with the -1.4 postfix.  Symlinks fix that, but it's annoying.

Second, configure completed (apparently successfully).  I run make and get:
	$ make
	cd . && aclocal-1.4
	cd . && automake-1.4 --gnu --include-deps Makefile
	cd . && autoconf
	autoconf: configure.in: No such file or directory
	make: *** [configure] Error 1

I've never bothered to pick up the auto* tools, so I am not sure what it's
bitching about, or even what it is doing.

Commenting that line out from the Makefile, it now starts to build.  But
blows up with:

gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../include/remix
-I/usr/local/include -g -O2 -Wall -c remix_base.c  -fPIC -DPIC -DPIC -o
remix_base.o
In file included from ../../include/remix/remix.h:162,
                 from remix_base.c:32:
../../include/remix/remix_types.h:38: ctxdata.h: No such file or directory
In file included from ../../include/remix/remix_types.h:142,
                 from ../../include/remix/remix.h:162,
                 from remix_base.c:32:
../../include/remix/remix_plugin.h:38: ctxdata.h: No such file or directory
In file included from ../../include/remix/remix_plugin.h:68,
                 from ../../include/remix/remix_types.h:142,
                 from ../../include/remix/remix.h:162,
                 from remix_base.c:32:
remix_private.h:43: ctxdata.h: No such file or directory

Since everything depends on ctxdata, shouldn't it just go into include/remix
or even be split into a separate libctxdata?