Thread: [Refdb-users] [REQUEST] new refdb tarball derived from trunk
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
From: FreeBSD U. <fr...@wa...> - 2022-01-30 15:47:33
|
The most recent refDB tarball is revision 1.0.2. Most recent LLVM/clang compiler default to gnu99, so there is an linker error triggered sourcing to src/readln.h (ld: error: duplicate symbol: thecommandlist), this problem has been solved in the main tree 4 months ago with commit 816. There are a couple of fixes in the trunk I'd like to see in a tarball, including the above compiler issue. As mainatiner of the FreeBSD port, the port is now marked unusable due to the linker error. For my private purposes, I solved the discrepancy via a large, 5 Mbytes large diff between trunk and 1.0.2, but it is considered inappropriate to maintain such a large diff file in the ports tree of FreeBSD ports. It would be very nice to have the recent trunk as a downloadable tarball. Kind regards, Oliver |
From: Markus H. <mar...@mh...> - 2022-01-31 13:44:55
|
Hi Oliver, just a quick response, although I don't have a new tarball yet. The project isn't dead as such. It still serves my purposes here at work, so there is no real need to change things from my end. I still try to fix incompatibilities that arise every now and then. I use the refdb-pubmed tool a lot which required a few fixes, and a few glitches had to be fixed in libdbi or its drivers. I have a few local changes on Windows+Cygwin that are not committed yet, and moving to a new desktop at work a few months ago left me unable to commit to the Subversion repository. This seems to be a local permission issue which I may not be able to resolve (I'm in a healthcare environment, I'm not allowed to fiddle with permissions). I'll move the local changes to my FreeBSD box at home to get them submitted eventually. I did a major FreeBSD version upgrade lately, so RefDB may need to be recompiled for any testing. The new tarball may take a few days so please don't hang on the edge of your seat. The good thing is that the present code here at work has been tested for quite a while. regards, Markus Am 2022-01-30 16:47, schrieb FreeBSD User: > The most recent refDB tarball is revision 1.0.2. > > Most recent LLVM/clang compiler default to gnu99, so there is an > linker error triggered > sourcing to src/readln.h (ld: error: duplicate symbol: > thecommandlist), this problem has > been solved in the main tree 4 months ago with commit 816. > > There are a couple of fixes in the trunk I'd like to see in a tarball, > including the > above compiler issue. > As mainatiner of the FreeBSD port, the port is now marked unusable due > to the linker > error. For my private purposes, I solved the discrepancy via a large, > 5 Mbytes large diff > between trunk and 1.0.2, but it is considered inappropriate to > maintain such a large diff > file in the ports tree of FreeBSD ports. > > It would be very nice to have the recent trunk as a downloadable > tarball. > > Kind regards, > > Oliver > > > _______________________________________________ > Refdb-users mailing list > Ref...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/refdb-users -- Markus Hoenicka http://www.mhoenicka.de AQ score 38 |
From: Markus H. <mar...@mh...> - 2022-02-13 22:47:00
|
Hi Oliver, I'm done adding my latest local changes, updated the documentation and implemented a new option to obviate the need to reconfigure an entire database server just to allow RefDB to run some legacy SQL. Please find the new tarball right here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/refdb/files/refdb-src/refdb-src-1.0.3/ Let me know if this new release should not work as expected. regards, Markus Am 2022-01-30 16:47, schrieb FreeBSD User: > The most recent refDB tarball is revision 1.0.2. > > Most recent LLVM/clang compiler default to gnu99, so there is an > linker error triggered > sourcing to src/readln.h (ld: error: duplicate symbol: > thecommandlist), this problem has > been solved in the main tree 4 months ago with commit 816. > > There are a couple of fixes in the trunk I'd like to see in a tarball, > including the > above compiler issue. > As mainatiner of the FreeBSD port, the port is now marked unusable due > to the linker > error. For my private purposes, I solved the discrepancy via a large, > 5 Mbytes large diff > between trunk and 1.0.2, but it is considered inappropriate to > maintain such a large diff > file in the ports tree of FreeBSD ports. > > It would be very nice to have the recent trunk as a downloadable > tarball. > > Kind regards, > > Oliver > > > _______________________________________________ > Refdb-users mailing list > Ref...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/refdb-users -- Markus Hoenicka http://www.mhoenicka.de AQ score 38 |