Re: [Refdb-users] citestyle's BIBLIOSEQUENCE sorts upper and lower alpha separately
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
|
From: Jeremy M. <Je...@Ma...> - 2007-04-24 14:03:24
|
> Quoting Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy <at> Malcolm.id.au>: > > > Another problem is that if no primary author is specified but a > > secondary author is specified (generally because you are citing a > > book that has editor/s rather than author/s), it lists all of > > those references at the start of the bibliography, before the letter > > A. The preferred behaviour would obviously be to interleave them > > with the other references. > > This is probably due to my (or your?) misunderstanding of how a book > should be encoded in RIS. I've assumed that the names printed on the > cover go into A1. Firstly, sorry for the delay in following up. I had disabled mail delivery from this list for a while and thought I had re-enabled it, but Sourceforge is a bit flaky that way. Anyway, I'm sure it is my misunderstanding, but the reason why I do it that way is because I need RefDB to print (ed) or (eds) after their names if they are editors, and it won't do that unless I put them into A2 rather than A1. -- Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}' |