Re: [Refdb-users] User feedback 3

[Markus H. <mar...@mh...>]

David Nebauer writes:
 > I've now tested the Makefile against my new refdbxml and refdbxmlrc 
 > files using all the xslt and fo processors included to date.
 > 
 > This includes: xalan, xt, saxon, saxon-xerces, xsltproc, passivetex, 
 > fop, xep and jfor.
 > 

Do you have the classpaths for all the Java apps handy? I'd like to
add example classpaths for each processor to the refdbxmlrc config
file.


 > The only thing still bugging me is the theoretical possibility of 
 > invoking refdbxml with a mismatch between the fo processor and output 
 > type (eg. jfor processor with pdf output).  Something like the following 
 > code could be inserted at the start of process_print:
 > 

I've added that too.

 > Other than that, I think it might do for now :-) .
 > 

If you think so... Thanks a lot for your work.

regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Hoenicka
mar...@ca...
(Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka")
http://www.mhoenicka.de