Re: [Refdb-users] MODS + RefDB
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
|
From: Bruce D'A. <bd...@fa...> - 2004-02-04 13:56:56
|
On Feb 4, 2004, at 3:33 AM, Justus H. Piater wrote: > Does anybody out there (Bruce, for instance) have practical experience > with using MODS (as the "master") in conjunction with RefDB? Let me expand a bit on my problems here: RefDB does not support extended citations (Smith, 1999:33-34), and they are *essential* to my work. So I can't use it now for processing. I've hacked Bibliofile (soon to be renamed BiblioX) to handle this support with MODS data, and Peter Flynn (the author) is currently implementing more comprehensive inline support. So...I'm in a bind here, and I've got deadlines! My primary data is currently MODS (mostly converted from Endnote), but I really need Peter to finish bibliofile, and for RefDB to support, in order of priority: 1) extended citations (the new biblioref element in DocBook) 2) MODS import/export Bruce |