Re: [BIBLIO] [Refdb-users] Re: The case against <middlename>
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
From: Bruce D'A. <bd...@fa...> - 2003-12-11 21:24:08
|
On Dec 11, 2003, at 3:41 PM, Markus Hoenicka wrote: > Does anyone have real-life examples of names along the lines of > "F. John Smith" in a journal that uses full first and initialized > middle names? This would indeed be the best proof why first and middle > names (or whatever you call them) need to be distinguishable. This business is all a non-issue for me. In my data, I always initialize middle names, because a) I never know the full middle names, and b) I cannot *ever* imagine using -- nor do I recall ever seeing -- a full middle name in any bibliographic entry, regardless of the style. With respect to the above, while I don't have a real world example at hand, I would expect to see this in the bib entry: Smith, F. John In essence, "F. John" is the first/given name. If anything, this supports the argument against middle names, I think. BTW, v3 of MODS adds a new type attribute: termOfAddress. Example: <name type="personal"> <namePart type="termOfAddress">Sir</namePart> <namePart type="given">Arthur</namePart> <namePart type="family">Conan Doyle</namePart> </name> Bruce |