bibliofile (was Re: [Refdb-users] Issues and Observations)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
|
From: <Jus...@UL...> - 2003-08-28 08:02:36
|
This sounds very interesting, it may be a good decision to concentrate the bib-style effort in this direction. Bruce D'Arcus <bd...@fa...> wrote on Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:00:25 -0400: > BTW, one possibility that I hope will work is to move to all-xslt=20 > formatting based on this framework that Peter Flynn (with comments and=20 > advice from Markus and I) has been working on. > > http://silmaril.ie/bibliofile/ > > I'm really optimistic about this, and the possibility that we'll be=20 > able to process MODS records (as an example) with default DocBook (and=20 > hopefully TEI) stylesheets, complete with support for extended and=20 > footnote citations. The idea is that just as one has a choice of table=20 > models to use in DocBook, so too would one have a choice of=20 > bibliographic support. --=20 Justus H. Piater, Ph.D. http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~piater Institut Montefiore, B28 Phone: +32-4-366-2279 Universit=E9 de Li=E8ge, Belgium Fax: +32-4-366-2620 |