Re: [Refdb-users] Question about Unicode
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
|
From: Marc B. <ba...@sm...> - 2003-02-26 14:56:26
|
Dear Markus, thanks for your detailed answer, and sorry for the late reply. >>> "Markus Hoenicka" said: >> Sorry about the installation hassles. I've been in contact with kind >> souls trying to package RefDB and the required libraries, but this is= >> apparently a pretty complex task. The build system has been modified >> already to allow simple "debianization", but there are no deliverable= s >> yet. Sure. Debianization would be great :)) >> > first problems. I have a reference with an author called H=F6=F6k,= >> What database server do you run? MySQL *should* accept umlauts >> (although I have to admit I never tried) as it uses a Latin encoding >> by default. PostgreSQL uses the SQL_ASCII encoding by default which I= >> believe does not handle umlauts. However, you can select a different >> encoding like LATIN1 with the -e switch of the refdba:createdb >> command, or you can make this the default by editing refdbdrc. Ah I see. I used the default setting, which creates UNICODE databases wit= h postgres. I will try with Latin1, as this is more likely what I had in mind. >> > in. I now can at least add the reference. But if I look eg at a se= arch >> The browser display problem is most likely due to the fact that the >> web browser does not know that these sequences are to be interpreted >> as Unicode characters. I'll have to find out how the RefDB-generated >> HTML pages could tell the browser about Unicode if the database serve= r >> uses this encoding. Yep. I think in that case one needs something like <META http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">= or so in the header, but I am not sure if that's all that is required. regards, Marc -- = Dr. Marc Baaden - Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris mailto:ba...@sm... - http://www.marc-baaden.de FAX: +49 697912 39550 - Tel: +33 15841 5176 ou +33 609 843217 |