Re: [Refdb-users] refdb and bibtex
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
|
From: Dylan O. <lo...@st...> - 2002-05-06 00:34:13
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 05 May 2002 18:18, Markus Hoenicka wrote: > Ok, this is bad. Even if it was no RefDB bug, there should be more > debug output to locate the bug. I'll put this on my todo-list. > - did you add the styles to the style database? Ah, no! I really wasn't clear on this. I added the styles to the database= , and=20 then it worked almost perfectly.=20 Almost, because of a minor but annoying mishandling of the ampersand (\&)= =20 character. While getref shows that it was preserved through the conversio= n of=20 my original .bib to .ris (with bib2ris) and importation with refdbc's add= ref,=20 refdbib outputs it as \& , which bibtex doesn't like.=20 Now that I think of it, the \& really shouldn't be preserved by bib2ris, = as it=20 wouldn't make sense to any of the other formats. Shouldn't it be translat= ed=20 by bib2ris into something (what?) the rest of the bibliography formats ca= n=20 deal with, and then translated back to \& by refdbib when using the bibte= x=20 output type? Would this be a difficult fix? I've got a wee bit of experie= nce=20 with C, and would be willing to look at it after I'm done with all of my = work=20 for the semester.. - --=20 Dylan Oliver=20 http://www.steelbend.org/~losang=20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE81dBFwDB3hYDfCecRAkHSAJ9Fuxib9DyGJOAiEGTKqFos3/+8VACcD9hN bXj5ZYeDwsNnLdKpYHCwoko=3D =3DDpIb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |