[Refdb-devel] [ refdb-Bugs-2795212 ] In extended note, <content> is missing
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-05-22 20:43:21
|
Bugs item #2795212, was opened at 2009-05-22 07:37 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhoenicka You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=385991&aid=2795212&group_id=26091 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: refdbd Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Torsten Bronger (bronger) Assigned to: Markus Hoenicka (mhoenicka) Summary: In extended note, <content> is missing Initial Comment: When I retrieve my personal references list, I get <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE xnoteset PUBLIC "-//Markus Hoenicka//DTD Xnote V1.2//EN" "http://refdb.sourceforge.net/dtd/xnote-1.2/xnote.dtd" [ <!ENTITY lt "&#60;"> <!ENTITY gt ">"> <!ENTITY amp "&#38;"> <!ENTITY mdash "—"> <!ENTITY lsquo "‘"> <!ENTITY rsquo "’"> ]> <xnoteset> <xnote id="3" citekey="drefdbuser1-drefdbuser1" user="drefdbuser1" date="2009-03-15" share="private"> <title>drefdbuser1-drefdbuser1</title> <link type="reference" target="TorstenBronger2009"/> </xnote> </xnoteset> So, <content> is missing although it is mandatory according to the DTD (which could be disputed, though). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Markus Hoenicka (mhoenicka) Date: 2009-05-22 22:43 Message: Unless I'm confused we had this discussion a while ago. In any case, the xnote.dtd no longer requires the content element as of April 11, so we obviously agreed to change the dtd instead of the software behaviour. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=385991&aid=2795212&group_id=26091 |