Re: [Refdb-devel] latex bibliographies with multiple databases
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mhoenicka
From: Damien J. D. <D.J...@cs...> - 2006-07-12 11:28:02
|
Markus Hoenicka wrote: > David Nebauer writes: > > > TITLE = {Why {AM} and {EURISKO} appear to work}, > > > > Alternately, you could save the title in plain Unicode with that > > capitalisation and refdb's BibTeX output filter would wrap any > > abnormally capitalised words in braces. That way your reference can be > > used in either DocBook XML/SGML or LaTeX output. > > > > If it is a matter of wrapping uppercased words in curly brackets, this > certainly doable. Is it likely to have uppercased words in bibtex data > which are *not* supposed to be rendered in all-caps? > > regards, > Markus > Gidday I imagine only where the style demands it (e.g. APA). Some journals have titles with pretty much everything (both proper and non-proper nouns and subitles and acronyms) capitalised. On the other hand, APA requires nouns that aren't proper to go lower case when citing - proper nouns and subitles can be uppercase. I don't know how this is managed in Docbook styles or Endnote etc, but presumably titles are used verbatim because I can't imagine any logic funky enough to figure out whether a word is a proper noun or not without some extra markup. If we're going to export all capitals to bibtex verbatim sans markup then I think we might as well, as a first approximation, rather than trying to second guess bibtex, just set the whole title as verbatim - e.g. TITLE = {{Why AM and EURISKO appear to work}}, Folks who use latex would probably have to turn non-proper nouns that are capitalised into lowercase before putting them in to RefDB and hope to seldom encounter a citation style that requires these things to be reproduced verbatim from the original article (I don't think I have yet). The same may possibly apply to BOOKTITLE, JOURNAL, SERIES, SCHOOL, PUBLISHER, INSTITUTION etc. My 2nd pennies worth. Regards Damien |