|
From: Arne B. <arn...@we...> - 2014-11-27 19:03:47
|
Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2014, 08:47:49 schrieb David A. Wheeler: > > However within "normal" s-expressions or neotheric expressions I'd have > second thoughts. How would this be parsed?: > > > foo bar > > . aaa . bbb ccc > > I agree, that should be an error. It doesn't really make any sense to me either. I expect this would continue to be ok: > > aaa bbb . ccc > => > (aaa bbb . ccc) > > And the following would still be an error: > aaa bbb . ccc ddd That’s also what wisp does: The leading dot is interpreted as continuation if it’s the first character in a line in indentation-sensitive code. It would be cool to see sweet and wisp move closer together here! Best wishes, Arne |
