Menu
▾
▴
reactos-kernel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(64) |
Oct
(438) |
Nov
(183) |
Dec
|
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(132) |
May
(466) |
Jun
(366) |
Jul
(392) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Eric K. <ek...@rz...> - 2002-05-29 21:46:12
|
"Casper Hornstrup" <ch...@us...> wrote: > Oh, it would be nice if you could fix such compatibility issues when you > spot them. It will make the transition easier ;o) Done! :-) > Another issue is, when we use w32api and winddk from MinGW, how do we > handle additions to those? We can submit patches to MinGW, but when our > code base depends on these additions, then ReactOS developers must use > the latest w32api and winddk from CVS in order to compile. Of course, we > can try to batch such additions in order to minimize the number of > upgrades necesarry. The only way to avoid any problems of this kind is to keep our own header files and import libraries (SDK and DDK). We'd have to sync them with MinGW every now and then. Even if we use the latest w32api and winddk from CVS, it will always take a while until a patch gets checked into the MinGW tree. Until then, the ReactOS CVS tree and the MinGW CVS tree will be out of sync. We'll have to avoid this. Eric |
|
From: Eric K. <ek...@rz...> - 2002-05-29 21:40:03
|
Modified files:
include/ntos/disk.h
ntoskrnl/io/xhaldrv.c
services/fs/vfat/fsctl.c
Message log:
Replaced linux partiton type constants. Kept them as reference.
Eric
|
|
From: Casper H. <ch...@us...> - 2002-05-29 20:33:37
|
ons, 2002-05-29 kl. 22:00 skrev Eric Kohl: > > "Casper Hornstrup" <ch...@us...> wrote: > > > > I have some time to do a cleanup of our code base. Is everyone using the > > latest MinGW release (gcc-3.1, w32api-1.4) ? If not, please upgrade > > soon. I will throw out our old Windows API headers and use MinGW > > whereever possible to have better code sharing with WINE. > > > > I will start reorganizing CVS like we discussed on this list. > > > > Any last words, before I begin? > > Are you going to replace our current DDK headers too? Not at first. I'll do this when I've submitted the Windows XP DDK to MinGW and gotten some feedback. I expect there to be some issues with packing. Then I'll have to add enough obsoleted Windows NT 4.0 structures so we can move over to this DDK. So in short, it will probably be at least a month before we can do this. > I noticed that our current code uses the PTxxx partition type constants > (propably taken from linux) instead of PARTITION_xxxx constants. I'd like to > fix that before you start cleaning up the mess. ;-) > > Eric Oh, it would be nice if you could fix such compatibility issues when you spot them. It will make the transition easier ;o) Another issue is, when we use w32api and winddk from MinGW, how do we handle additions to those? We can submit patches to MinGW, but when our code base depends on these additions, then ReactOS developers must use the latest w32api and winddk from CVS in order to compile. Of course, we can try to batch such additions in order to minimize the number of upgrades necesarry. - Casper |
|
From: Eric K. <ek...@rz...> - 2002-05-29 19:59:03
|
"Casper Hornstrup" <ch...@us...> wrote: > I have some time to do a cleanup of our code base. Is everyone using the > latest MinGW release (gcc-3.1, w32api-1.4) ? If not, please upgrade > soon. I will throw out our old Windows API headers and use MinGW > whereever possible to have better code sharing with WINE. > > I will start reorganizing CVS like we discussed on this list. > > Any last words, before I begin? Are you going to replace our current DDK headers too? I noticed that our current code uses the PTxxx partition type constants (propably taken from linux) instead of PARTITION_xxxx constants. I'd like to fix that before you start cleaning up the mess. ;-) Eric |
|
From: Jason F. <jas...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 19:58:26
|
Its coming - the lists are already set up, we're just having some small problems changing the MX record. Looks like the best way is to move our entire site over to LiquidPages. - Jason --- Steven Edwards <ste...@ya...> wrote: > > Sh*t. Sorry Steven. It was kind of my bad. Didn't > > read your msg till just > > now. > > Its alright. We need to get ros-general back up so we > can have these heated debates. Anyone heard any info > about that? Phillip you still alive? > > > Thanks > Steven > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > reactos-kernel mailing list > rea...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert K. <ro...@ko...> - 2002-05-29 18:53:32
|
I think keeping wine is superfluous. We'd rather establish a dynamic import and patch process. What about the OS2 sub system? It'll get its own module- OK. Who will do this? When? What will be the name? How can I reach it? Is it still CVS? Shall I establish my own build process? Casper Hornstrup schrieb: > ons, 2002-05-29 kl. 02:33 skrev Steven Edwards: > > So what is the final outline for strucure of our cvs tree? This is the > > way I think we have it but I want to double check. This is by no means a > > compleate outline. > > > > CVSROOT - > > -win32 (wine tree + certain moved reactos/lib modules) > > -include > > -dlls > > -tools > > -programs > > ? > > > > Thanks > > Steven > > Are we keeping WINE in our CVS? When WINE compiles with MinGW, we really > don't need to have any ReactOS specific modifications to it, so it would > be better to checkout a copy of WINE from the WINE CVS instead. Then > there is no need to synchronize two modules. > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > reactos-kernel mailing list > rea...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel |
|
From: Robert K. <ro...@ko...> - 2002-05-29 18:48:08
|
Some years ago I was also a flamer. But I went tired. Remember: you can't change one others mind - at least not with agression. So come to our "higher" non-flamer level and let the others live. > It's cool, but remember that flames go both ways. It's not good for > us to flame Linux and the Linux community, no matter if some of us > have had a bad experience or two. A linux user on the list that reads > that flame would feel the same way about us - that they've been > insulted. It's best that we all just try and get along - after all > ReactOS is about reacting to the Microsoft monopoly, certainly > __not__ reacting against Linux! > > - Jason |
|
From: Jason F. <jas...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 18:39:36
|
--- Nick Date <nic...@ya...> wrote: >I was reacting. The reason ReactOS was being slated was, I suspect, >because Linux people see ROS as a threat rather than an ally. They >see a potentially superior and more mainstream-compatible kernel >and they poo their pants. I don't know how all Linux people perceive ReactOS, generally I think a lot of them don't know everything about what we're doing. At wineconf it was surprising how many people didn't know much about what we were doing. However, they were very interested to listen. It doesn't really matter if some (and you can't generalize about all of them) people in the Linux community see us as a threat (_if_ they do). I think we should just focus on promoting ourselves as an ally with them. >I went to the forum with no preconception and I was flamed by about >3 people who blatantly spent their entire lives with their eyes >glued to a "VDU". Well, that's their lose, and we know that. But I'm very sure not all people who use Linux are flamers. >Maybe ROS is too "Windozey" for Linux users? I don't know, but I >don't think you should have to have a degree in Computer Science to >install an OS (which is why I use Win XP). Well that's where the Linux distro companies come in - they focus on hiring people to make it easy to use (among other things). Of course, I'm sure ReactOS will be a lot easier to use than most Linux distros because Windows (which we're mostly trying to clone) was designed with the user in mind from the start. >Hehe. Sorry if I offended you, I didn't mean to stereotype all >Linux users, I've just had some bad experiences getting help. I >suppose at the end of the day it's personal preference. Don't get >me wrong, Linux has it's uses (I seem to remember hearing embedded >Linux is taking off at the moment), but as a desktop OS (which is >what I need) it's no good for me. It's cool, but remember that flames go both ways. It's not good for us to flame Linux and the Linux community, no matter if some of us have had a bad experience or two. A linux user on the list that reads that flame would feel the same way about us - that they've been insulted. It's best that we all just try and get along - after all ReactOS is about reacting to the Microsoft monopoly, certainly __not__ reacting against Linux! - Jason __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert K. <ro...@ko...> - 2002-05-29 18:35:26
|
> > > The licenses legal state were discussed in some other sites/forums. From what > I get copyright are not covered the same way all over the world. For example > see 128 bits encryption status: legal in some countries and illegal in > others. Here is Israel ,if I am not mistaking, unassemble and reverse > engineering in software is not illegal. Licenses are covered by local laws of > each country. (where is ros located? us? if not we could move it to another > place). There are in fact countrys that have no copy right. Especially in the near east. Some arabian countrys. And I think Taiwan. This is also what I suggested. Locate the foundation in souch a country, where one can buy DatacenterServer for 4 US$. |
|
From: Diego I. <ias...@ac...> - 2002-05-29 16:59:03
|
Hello list
The licenses legal state were discussed in some other sites/forums. From what
I get copyright are not covered the same way all over the world. For example
see 128 bits encryption status: legal in some countries and illegal in
others. Here is Israel ,if I am not mistaking, unassemble and reverse
engineering in software is not illegal. Licenses are covered by local laws of
each country. (where is ros located? us? if not we could move it to another
place).
I want to remind you all the debate about the ms eula, which says that you can
run that program (ms-word , ie) on any ms operating system, and there for you
may not run it under (for example) linux using wine, or lindows.
This eula is not legal, since they cant force you to run the program how under
a specific os, nor resctirct you to the use of the program ("it is unlegal
to run ms-word in win95, please upgrade to winxp or else", or "no you cannot
compile an os system core in vc6, nor a browser"). And if they will sue, it
will never stand in course. (another dabate could be the no warranty for non
free programs, but lets keep it another thread)
Header files are not code but definition of standard values and declaration of
function names and structures. These structs could be written from the
definitions: foo() needs a struct sized n bytes, the first 4 are a
signature/magic number equal to X, the next 2 the time and etc. These
definition do not implict of anything that the program does. That is why
header are most times not changed while the binary implementation that uses
them do change. That is where the real secrets are.
what i really want to say is best sad in arabic "yalla"! (which can be
translated as lets go). they cant sue, and they don't have someone to sue.
On Monday 27 May 2002 17:10, Robert K. wrote:
> I think there is a passus that restricts the use of the files to only
> _MS_-windows developement
>
> Since this header is exchangeable and its use is not forbidden (until now),
> I'll use it for now.
>
btw: if anyone replies in this list please delete the sourge force signatures
from the original post, I will get those lines anyway, and it annoys me to
d/l a lot of unusable bytes.
- diego
--
Today, THREE WINOS from DETROIT sold me a framed photo of TAB HUNTER
before his MAKEOVER!
|
|
From: Steven E. <ste...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 16:33:38
|
> Sh*t. Sorry Steven. It was kind of my bad. Didn't > read your msg till just > now. Its alright. We need to get ros-general back up so we can have these heated debates. Anyone heard any info about that? Phillip you still alive? Thanks Steven __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com |
|
From: Nick D. <nic...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 14:34:14
|
Hi Hyperion, ----- Original Message ----- From: "KJK::Hyperion" <no...@li...> To: <rea...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 6:37 PM Subject: Re: [ros-kernel] Forward: "ReactOS is too limited" > At 12.33 28/05/2002, you wrote: > > [...] > > no, no, no, please. This leads nowhere. It's a gratuitous flame bait > On the other hand, "my" guy makes interesting points: > - why should people invest time and money on ReactOS? > - how will ReactOS survive to legal actions from Microsoft? > - isn't Windows too much of a moving target? Yu're right. Say sorry to your mate for me. I just feel the same way about Linux (as a desktop OS anyway). Apologies, Nick. -- Nick Date Bath, England, UK --- Outgoing mail is certified virus free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.365 / Virus Database: 202 - Release Date: 24/05/2002 _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Nick D. <nic...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 14:31:52
|
Sh*t. Sorry Steven. It was kind of my bad. Didn't read your msg till just now. It was win32 & ros vs. Linux anways. :-) -- Nick Date Bath, England, UK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Edwards" <Ste...@ya...> To: <rea...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 5:35 PM Subject: RE: [ros-kernel] Forward: "ReactOS is too limited" > /bitchslap > > KILL THIS THREAD NOW. We've had this discussion before and it has been > debated over and over on slashdot. If you want to argue NT vs LINUX take > it there. > > Thanks > Steven > > "Every revolution was once a thought in one man's mind" > - Ralph Waldo Emerson > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > reactos-kernel mailing list > rea...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel --- Outgoing mail is certified virus free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.365 / Virus Database: 202 - Release Date: 24/05/2002 _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Nick D. <nic...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 14:30:23
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart Urquhart" <man...@ki...> To: <rea...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:09 PM Subject: Re: [ros-kernel] Forward: "ReactOS is too limited" > >>Linux may be good as a web server. Apache is an excellent program, but > >>people will be able to run the win32 version on ReactOS soon so what > >>possible use will Linux have then? (except maybe as a firewall - wow!). > >> > > > >You are exagerating here. For management tasks I prefer a commandline over a > >GUI. A commandline interface is usually easier to design, and is therefore > >often more informative. I really dislike using the mouse, and I feel I am > >forced to use it in a GUI. > >Linux is a perfect server-machine, though it has several disadvantages > >running it as a desktop OS. At home all my files are stored on my Debian > >server, which is also webserver, mail-server, filewall, router, etc... To > >work i use a windows machine. More and more often i find myself working on > >the server via Putty, because of it's wonderfull commandline interface... > > > >What use does a webserver have, wasting it's precious processorcycles on > >maintaining a desktopwindow? I guess the only enviroment that justifies a > >GUI (or more specifict to win32, the GDI) is a desktop machine. > I suppose it depends who you're targetting Reactos for. > What i'd like to see is Reactos having an option to the end user - Do > you want the gdi installed/enabled or not? (So if your using reactos as > a server, the cpu isn't being "hogged" by the gdi) That's an excellent idea. That way, ROS would be good as a server and for things like embedded devices, add that to a good GDI/GUI and it's good for the desktop. [snip] > What i find hard is to actually use linux as a dekstop - I just don't > get the same feeling, and i'm constantly thinking how will i run Windows > Game X on it, or > Y program. I simply can't get used to it, and i keep reverting to using > windows. I'd like to use linux, but i just can't get to grips with it. The thing is that ReactOS will be like that for a while until everything is implemented. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Date Bath, England, UK --- Outgoing mail is certified virus free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.365 / Virus Database: 202 - Release Date: 24/05/2002 _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Nick D. <nic...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 14:26:31
|
Hi Koert, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Koert van der Veer" <ko...@ic...> To: <rea...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:20 PM Subject: Re: [ros-kernel] Forward: "ReactOS is too limited" > [snip] > > > > After looking through reams of unhelpful (and sometimes contradictory) > Linux > > FAQs and other DOCs, I ventured onto some Linux forums where I was told to > > "RTFM" (by people with 5 inch thick glasses, a permanent hunch and acne > that > > would make a leopard feel jealous, I have no doubt). > > > > The Linux command line is unhelpful, unfriendly and unforgiving. Maybe it > > was useful in the past (to save disk space, processor power, memory, etc.) > > to use an OS with a minimal amount of messages, but times have changed. We > > live in an age where the minimum spec processor you can buy (at least in > the > > UK) is 1 GHz and systems come with 512MB RAM standard. > > > > Linux may be good as a web server. Apache is an excellent program, but > > people will be able to run the win32 version on ReactOS soon so what > > possible use will Linux have then? (except maybe as a firewall - wow!). > > > You are exagerating here. For management tasks I prefer a commandline over a > GUI. A commandline interface is usually easier to design, and is therefore > often more informative. I really dislike using the mouse, and I feel I am > forced to use it in a GUI. Maybe I am exagerrating slightly but I have had some pretty bad experiences with Linux and one of the Linux Posse's. I find it easier to do some things command line and some mouse - I've written some wicked batch files in my time, but I like a combination. The trouble with the command line is that any app written for it will have it's own interface, so for word processing, email, news, etc. I find the mouse a lot easier to use. > Linux is a perfect server-machine, though it has several disadvantages > running it as a desktop OS. At home all my files are stored on my Debian > server, which is also webserver, mail-server, filewall, router, etc... To > work i use a windows machine. More and more often i find myself working on > the server via Putty, because of it's wonderfull commandline interface... Maybe because I was looking for a desktop OS I found Linux to be a bit of the pain in the arse. I imagine if so many people use it as a web server it must generally be good at serving. :-) > What use does a webserver have, wasting it's precious processorcycles on > maintaining a desktopwindow? I guess the only enviroment that justifies a > GUI (or more specifict to win32, the GDI) is a desktop machine. You're right, of course. Novell's NetWare OS isn't that pretty to look at but it's probably quicker than an NT server. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Date Bath, England, UK --- Outgoing mail is certified virus free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.365 / Virus Database: 202 - Release Date: 24/05/2002 _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Casper H. <ch...@us...> - 2002-05-29 14:19:36
|
ons, 2002-05-29 kl. 05:45 skrev Steven Edwards: > > Maybe we can switch to a better revision control system. > > There was an article on slashdot about bitkeeper. It has a > > strange status (not open source), but it is used for linux kernel. > > I would like to stick with cvs just because it will make importing a > fork of WINE easy. > > Thanks > Steven > > "Every revolution was once a thought in one man's mind" > - Ralph Waldo Emerson Importing files should be no more difficult with another version control system. You just use "cvs export <module>" with CVS and use whatever is needed to import files using the other version control system. I have been monitoring the progress of subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org). I have set up a read/write test site at http://reactos.wox.org:7000/svn/reactos. If anyone want to try it out, go to subversion.tigris.org and grab a client. Then use "svn co http://reactos.wox.org:7000/svn/reactos" to checkout a copy. - Casper |
|
From: Nick D. <nic...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 14:17:55
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Mauritz" <ox...@st...>
To: <rea...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [ros-kernel] Forward: "ReactOS is too limited"
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:10:38PM +0100, Nick Date wrote:
> with what right do you think you're allowed to bash his system (linux) and
> on the other hand want to disallow him to bash yours (win32)?
I was reacting. The reason ReactOS was being slated was, I suspect, because
Linux people see ROS as a threat rather than an ally. They see a potentially
superior and more mainstream-compatible kernel and they poo their pants.
> with what right do you insult "the linux community" ("people with 5 inc
thick
> glasses etcpp) who you don't pay but expect them to wipe of your ass?
I went to the forum with no preconception and I was flamed by about 3 people
who blatantly spent their entire lives with their eyes glued to a "VDU".
> with what right do you argue about how I want to use my 1gb ram and 1.3ghz
> cpu?
You can do what you want with it, mate, but don't expect everyone else
appreciate not knowing what the hell is wrong with their machines.
Maybe ROS is too "Windozey" for Linux users? I don't know, but I don't think
you should have to have a degree in Computer Science to install an OS (which
is why I use Win XP).
> with what right do you think that the ia32-architecture is the only one
around?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think I said I did. I'd love to port
ROS to the Amiga one day. AMD/Intel is the most commonly used, though.
> and how do you come to the idea that linux is the only command line
oriented
> OS around?
It's the most frequently used. Unless you're running FreeDOS which is fine
for certain applications.
> <irc class="people from linux forums">
> /me wonders
> </irc>
Hehe. Sorry if I offended you, I didn't mean to stereotype all Linux users,
I've just had some bad experiences getting help. I suppose at the end of the
day it's personal preference. Don't get me wrong, Linux has it's uses (I
seem to remember hearing embedded Linux is taking off at the moment), but as
a desktop OS (which is what I need) it's no good for me.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Date
Bath, England, UK
---
Outgoing mail is certified virus free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.365 / Virus Database: 202 - Release Date: 24/05/2002
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
From: Casper H. <ch...@us...> - 2002-05-29 14:08:16
|
ons, 2002-05-29 kl. 02:33 skrev Steven Edwards: > So what is the final outline for strucure of our cvs tree? This is the > way I think we have it but I want to double check. This is by no means a > compleate outline. > > CVSROOT - > -win32 (wine tree + certain moved reactos/lib modules) > -include > -dlls > -tools > -programs > ? > > Thanks > Steven Are we keeping WINE in our CVS? When WINE compiles with MinGW, we really don't need to have any ReactOS specific modifications to it, so it would be better to checkout a copy of WINE from the WINE CVS instead. Then there is no need to synchronize two modules. |
|
From: Jason F. <jas...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 07:29:55
|
I vote for the backdoor approach, since a lot of files will be moved. I don't think it matters where they used to be. I've got a complete listing of what needs to be moved, I'll mail that to the list tonight. - Jason --- Rex Jolliff <re...@lv...> wrote: > At 12:34 AM 5/29/02 +0200, you wrote: > >I have some time to do a cleanup of our code base. Is everyone > using the > >latest MinGW release (gcc-3.1, w32api-1.4) ? If not, please > upgrade > >soon. I will throw out our old Windows API headers and use MinGW > >whereever possible to have better code sharing with WINE. > > > >I will start reorganizing CVS like we discussed on this list. > > > >Any last words, before I begin? > > If the reorganization of the repository is going to involve a large > number of files, we can backdoor it by moving directories in the > repository. This of course will break old versions, which may not > be a problem, but the version history will be preserved. Of course > the ideal approach is to move the files the cvs way, that is, with > add/remove pairs for each file and a commit with a reasonable > commit indicating the move. > > > Rex Jolliff > re...@lv... > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > reactos-kernel mailing list > rea...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com |
|
From: Rex J. <re...@lv...> - 2002-05-29 06:48:30
|
At 07:13 AM 5/29/02 +0200, you wrote: >Hi all. I wanted to flush the last changes to POSIX+ before the switch to >the new source tree, but the CVS server looks down? My bad, apparently there was a power outage during the day that lasted longer than the capacity of the UPS on mok. >_______________________________________________________________ > >Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference >August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > >_______________________________________________ >reactos-kernel mailing list >rea...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel Rex Jolliff re...@lv... |
|
From: Steven E. <Ste...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 06:26:01
|
> At 02.33 29/05/2002, you wrote: > >ONE MORE TIME - If anyone is feeling frisky and wants to help on my > >WINE > >work email me already. > > Sorry, I'd help, but I always try to avoid anything involving > shell scripts :-( All that is really needed is "something" that 1. Runs ./configure 2. Converts the Makefiles. It could be a small c program that parses the Makefiles and imports them in to reactos makefiles. I really don't care at this point, hell even bringing out the ducktape and using Perl would be fine as it wont be part of the standard build process. Thanks Steven "Every revolution was once a thought in one man's mind" - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
|
From: KJK::Hyperion <no...@li...> - 2002-05-29 05:53:44
|
At 02.33 29/05/2002, you wrote: >ONE MORE TIME - If anyone is feeling frisky and wants to help on my WINE >work email me already. Sorry, I'd help, but I always try to avoid anything involving shell scripts :-( >So what is the final outline for strucure of our cvs tree? This is the way >I think we have it but I want to double check. This is by no means a >compleate outline. Perfect |
|
From: KJK::Hyperion <no...@li...> - 2002-05-29 05:53:43
|
At 04.18 29/05/2002, you wrote: >Watcom compiler has been released as open source software. >http://www.openwatcom.org >Anyone brave enough to try to compile reactos with it? :) Maybe I'll try. Just to see if it's at least compatible with binutils (Borland C++ isn't, since it outputs OMF, instead of COFF, object files. But all I need is a Turbo Assembler compatible assembler that outputs COFF). I want to make headers compatible, at least |
|
From: KJK::Hyperion <no...@li...> - 2002-05-29 05:11:52
|
Hi all. I wanted to flush the last changes to POSIX+ before the switch to the new source tree, but the CVS server looks down? |
|
From: Steven E. <Ste...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 04:07:23
|
I've been spreading my self a little thin as of late but I will fix reactos.dhs.org with slackware 8.1. The current slack install had some bugs with the PHP but I loaded some of the packages from 8.1rc1 and it seems to be going a little better. With any luck I will find some time to work on it this week. Thanks Steven "Every revolution was once a thought in one man's mind" - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
8 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
