From: Diego I. <ias...@ac...> - 2002-07-23 16:52:03
|
=E1=E9=E5=ED =F8=E0=F9=E5=EF, 21 =E1=E9=E5=EC=E9 2002, 01:31, Royce Mitch= ell III =EB=FA=E1: > At login you are presented with a list of users, and each user's icon ( > obviously unnecessary ). If a user is already logged in ( wouldn't happ= en > on boot-up obviously ) then it shows that user as being logged in. This > isn't really why I say it's better, but I can't think of a better way t= o do > this. The better part is this: User's can log off without having to shu= t > down the applications they are running. I realize this is a tall order,= and > probably would be difficult to pull off, but it is one of the few featu= res > I actually like in XP. do you mean switch user? note that this user is still logged on. OTOH, a program that wil run for several users (sharing memory && recourc= es) =20 wil be cool. Think of cmd.exe, windows commander, ICQ and what ever. I wo= uld=20 like to share this programs betwen logged users. - diego --=20 Let sleeping dogs lie. -- Charles Dickens |