From: Jason F. <jas...@ya...> - 2002-07-22 06:11:31
|
Since these guys may not have the source, I think I'll try and contact them. Just to find out what they're up to and if they do have any source that would scare us off. - Jason --- Rex Jolliff <re...@lv...> wrote: > At 04:19 PM 7/20/02 -0700, you wrote: > >In some ways, no. If you look at an operating system, where any > >developer writing something for it goes by the "This works so it > >must be ok" mantra, you get software designed to run under a > system of > >behaviors. > > Your point about undocumented behavior is well taken, but not as > relevant when it comes to win32 I believe. > > > For example, your wish to have an alternative shell. How do > >you wish to do that and maintain 100% compatibility? > >-Ian > > Our stated goal is not '100% compatibility', whatever you mean by > that. Instead it is an OS which is compatible with the win32 api > and > the NTDDK api (at least those parts that are documented). Once we > get there, the vast majority of software that runs under windows > will > run under reactos. I for one don't think its productive to strive > for 100% > api compatibility, we should insted implement all documented apis > to the spec that is available. > > > Rex Jolliff > re...@lv... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > reactos-kernel mailing list > rea...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com |