From: Royce M. I. <ro...@ev...> - 2002-07-21 23:02:49
|
I completely agree. When ReactOS gets big enough, it will hopefully force developers to not use undocumented APIs. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rex Jolliff" <re...@lv...> To: <rea...@li...> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [ros-kernel] Chinese government to develop Windows clone > At 04:19 PM 7/20/02 -0700, you wrote: > >In some ways, no. If you look at an operating system, where any > >developer writing something for it goes by the "This works so it > >must be ok" mantra, you get software designed to run under a system of > >behaviors. > > Your point about undocumented behavior is well taken, but not as > relevant when it comes to win32 I believe. > > > For example, your wish to have an alternative shell. How do > >you wish to do that and maintain 100% compatibility? > >-Ian > > Our stated goal is not '100% compatibility', whatever you mean by > that. Instead it is an OS which is compatible with the win32 api and > the NTDDK api (at least those parts that are documented). Once we > get there, the vast majority of software that runs under windows will > run under reactos. I for one don't think its productive to strive for 100% > api compatibility, we should insted implement all documented apis > to the spec that is available. > > > Rex Jolliff > re...@lv... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > reactos-kernel mailing list > rea...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel > |