Re: [ros-kernel] Re: ROS gui

[Royce M. I. <ro...@ev...>]

Because ours would be better :)  MS's explorer is over-bloated. I found a
utility that lets me run the win95 explorer in win98. I was shocked and
amazed at how much performance the win98 explorer sucks out of your
computer. We could write an explorer, or "rexplorer" if you like, that's
faster than the Win95 version, and more stable. ( For example, every time I
delete a large quantity of files - and I do mean every time - the computer
locks up for 5 - 45 seconds. As a developer I delete a large quantity of
files rather frequently, and I find this very annoying. )

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Marjie" <jid...@sa...>
To: <rea...@li...>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ros-kernel] Re: ROS gui


Why should we clone explorer? If we use a free one or wite a free one, if
the
person doesn't like it could they just not download the newest explorer.

--
James Marjie

On Friday 19 July 2002 01:42 pm, Richard Campbell wrote:
> I think you guys need to stop thinking like geeks and start thinking like
> AOLers... (i.e. explorer DOES need to be cloned because it is part of
> windows nt.)
>
> PS, I've missed out on alot of ROS development (although very few people
> have missed my flames I'm sure :)) I hope to be up to speed



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
reactos-kernel mailing list
rea...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel