From: Rex J. <re...@lv...> - 2002-05-30 01:08:51
|
At 07:13 PM 5/28/02 -0700, you wrote: >Maybe we can switch to a better revision control system. There was an >article on slashdot about bitkeeper. It has a strange status (not open >source), but it is used for linux kernel. I have looked at other revision control systems in the past, and didn't find any that meets my needs for free. There is ClearCase if you want the Cadillac of such systems, but its a burden to configure and maintain, not to mention real pricey. CVS has been around a long time and is solid and meets our needs. It has the limitation that it cannot track movement of files, and I agree this is a nasty limitation to have, but we can live with it, as Jason or I will do the bulk moves needed to satisfy the new layout. I really don't have time to acquire, install, configure and maintain a new revision control system these days, I still haven't even found time to setup cvsup for Brian (I'll try this weekend, honest :-)). So, unless I hear some very compelling arguments for another system, my vote is to stay with CVS. Rex Jolliff re...@lv... |