From: Jason F. <jas...@ya...> - 2002-05-29 07:29:55
|
I vote for the backdoor approach, since a lot of files will be moved. I don't think it matters where they used to be. I've got a complete listing of what needs to be moved, I'll mail that to the list tonight. - Jason --- Rex Jolliff <re...@lv...> wrote: > At 12:34 AM 5/29/02 +0200, you wrote: > >I have some time to do a cleanup of our code base. Is everyone > using the > >latest MinGW release (gcc-3.1, w32api-1.4) ? If not, please > upgrade > >soon. I will throw out our old Windows API headers and use MinGW > >whereever possible to have better code sharing with WINE. > > > >I will start reorganizing CVS like we discussed on this list. > > > >Any last words, before I begin? > > If the reorganization of the repository is going to involve a large > number of files, we can backdoor it by moving directories in the > repository. This of course will break old versions, which may not > be a problem, but the version history will be preserved. Of course > the ideal approach is to move the files the cvs way, that is, with > add/remove pairs for each file and a commit with a reasonable > commit indicating the move. > > > Rex Jolliff > re...@lv... > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > reactos-kernel mailing list > rea...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com |