Menu
▾
▴
re-alpine-devel
|
From: Jeremy C. R. <re...@re...> - 2009-09-02 01:06:24
|
I have started using re-alpine 2.01. For now, I am just installing a re-alpine binary and re-alpine manual page so I don't conflict with other file names. I built a pkgsrc package for it and I am using on NetBSD. But I haven't patched the names in the files themselves. I see it is installed as "alpine" and it installs other tools using historical pine names. Is the plan to rebrand and call this re-alpine? Is it appropriate for the fork to use the same names? Or is alpine planning to update based on re-alpine? Will there be a webpage for re-alpine beyond existing sourceforge webpage? Also I see some alpine patches: maildir.patch.gz, searchheader.patch.gz, and fancy.patch.gz. Are those applicable for re-alpine too? (I didn't check them.) |
|
From: Andraž 'r. L. <ru...@co...> - 2009-09-02 05:43:50
|
:2009-09-01T20:06:Jeremy C. Reed: > I see it is installed as "alpine" and it installs other tools using > historical pine names. > As does alpine and pine. Those names tend to be unchanged from what I know most of the time pico is still pico. > Is the plan to rebrand and call this re-alpine? Is it appropriate for the > fork to use the same names? Or is alpine planning to update based on > re-alpine? Not really as I have received information from Steve Hubert that they don't plan on doing much anymore so I don't really see a point in renaming. Infact re-alpine is just alpine but on a community base. > Will there be a webpage for re-alpine beyond existing sourceforge webpage? Sure though someone would need to create it. That someone might be me or someone else. If I find the time I'll do it. > Also I see some alpine patches: maildir.patch.gz, searchheader.patch.gz, > and fancy.patch.gz. Are those applicable for re-alpine too? (I didn't > check them.) Hmm those might have gotten in there by mistake. I'll look into it. -- Andraž ruskie Levstik Source Mage GNU/Linux Games/Xorg grimoire guru Re-Alpine Coordinator http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/ Geek/Hacker/Tinker Show them the ropes and soon they've used that rope to build a bridge to their future. |
|
From: Mark C. <mrc...@pa...> - 2009-09-02 14:35:53
|
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote: > I have received information from Steve Hubert that they > don't plan on doing much anymore So it's finally official. It's still sad. The UW IMAP/[al]pine project was a big part of my life. -- Mark -- http://panda.com/mrc Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote. |
|
From: Andraž 'r. L. <ru...@co...> - 2009-11-27 07:51:35
|
:2009-09-02T07:43:Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik: > > Also I see some alpine patches: maildir.patch.gz, searchheader.patch.gz, > > and fancy.patch.gz. Are those applicable for re-alpine too? (I didn't > > check them.) > > Hmm those might have gotten in there by mistake. I'll look into it. Misunderstood you there. Thought you had found those in the tarball. Those patches are by Eduardo Chappa. Some are still some aren't you can see which can still apply and which can't in the Source Mage spell: http://scmweb.sourcemage.org/?p=smgl/grimoire.git;a=commit;h=6ab3a61e57fda8eb02430ccd1f228db4bd667802 But to give a quick run down: unverified.patch streamlock.patch unixnullbug.patch status.patch circtab.patch reply.patch fromheader.patch colortext.patch searchheader.patch delpassword.patch preservefields.patch base64errors.patch streaminfo.patch colorfolder.patch tokencolor.patch rules.patch outgoing.patch fillpara.patch maildir.patch All of these will apply on 2.01. You'll see 3 extra diffs in the spell: maildir.patch.diff outgoing.patch.diff rules.patch.diff Those are patches for those patches. They make them apply to the 2.01 tree. I couldn't fix any of the other patches. And I'm still hopping some might be added to re-alpine directly if Eduardo will be willing to license them in such a way. Sorry for the long reply. -- Andraž ruskie Levstik Source Mage GNU/Linux Games/Xorg grimoire guru Re-Alpine Coordinator http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/ Geek/Hacker/Tinker Ryle hira. |
|
From: Jan E. <je...@me...> - 2009-11-27 09:06:22
|
On Friday 2009-11-27 08:51, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote: >:2009-09-02T07:43:Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik: > >> > Also I see some alpine patches: maildir.patch.gz, searchheader.patch.gz, >> > and fancy.patch.gz. Are those applicable for re-alpine too? (I didn't >> > check them.) >> >> Hmm those might have gotten in there by mistake. I'll look into it. > >Misunderstood you there. Thought you had found those in the tarball. >Those patches are by Eduardo Chappa. As part of moving the openSUSE alpine package forward to re-alpine, I had to still apply some of Eduardo's patches on top to finish re-alpine. There is a tree at git://dev.medozas.de/re-alpine that has them integrated. Can you merge? |
|
From: Andraž 'r. L. <ru...@co...> - 2009-11-27 09:21:40
|
:2009-11-27T10:06:Jan Engelhardt: > As part of moving the openSUSE alpine package forward to re-alpine, > I had to still apply some of Eduardo's patches on top to finish > re-alpine. There is a tree at I've asked Eduardo about integrating the Bug fixes patches. Any other he already said he does not yet allow them ( see bug: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2805218&group_id=264924&atid=1128051). This includes Maildir and some others you have included there. Regards -- Andraž ruskie Levstik Source Mage GNU/Linux Games/Xorg grimoire guru Re-Alpine Coordinator http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/ Geek/Hacker/Tinker Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
|
From: Jan E. <je...@me...> - 2009-11-27 09:48:54
|
On Friday 2009-11-27 10:21, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote: >:2009-11-27T10:06:Jan Engelhardt: > >> As part of moving the openSUSE alpine package forward to re-alpine, >> I had to still apply some of Eduardo's patches on top to finish >> re-alpine. There is a tree at > >I've asked Eduardo about integrating the Bug fixes patches. Any other >he already said he does not yet allow them ( see bug: >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2805218&group_id=264924&atid=1128051). >This includes Maildir and some others you have included there. So either distributions have screwed up on the legal matter, or it's simply taken as that the patches have the same license as the program they patch. |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X