From: Christian W. <cw...@cw...> - 2007-04-28 16:56:36
|
> In the last two weeks I have addressed LIMIT and UNION support in my > database-driven sparql engine. For this, I extended the current sparql > parser to parse LIMITs and convert them into a nice tree. The tree make= s > it easily possible to replace the current code in the old, memory based= > SparqlEngine limit handling code (which has a barn-door wide security > hole currently by using the evil eval() function to verify limit > clauses) by a secure alternative. I didn't have time to do this yet. > SparqlEngineDb's LIMIT support is nearly finished; the 41 limit unit > tests pass (with the exception of three which are either not possible t= o > implement, or are not worth the required work [which would be huge] and= > would slow down the queries badly. All of them are edge cases.). I don't know why I confuse LIMIT with FILTER when talking or writing. I meant I implemented full FILTER support. --=20 Regards/Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Christian Weiske |