From: Jonathan H. <hen...@ya...> - 2005-05-02 04:56:08
|
The inference engines of RAP do basic inference with a standard RDFS - but, for example, SWOOP OWL and Protege RDFS uses a different namespace. So when using inference RAP only supports the RDFS and OWL built in. I am getting at a more general question here: RAP has done a lot of work in standards compliance and keeping pace with other initiatives like Jenna. But perhaps part of making RAP a most useful semantic web infrastructure tool would be to "integrate" with the output of most popular editors. I think that RAP at its core must be an angel of standards compliance, so maybe these integration tools aren't meant to be part of RAP? But the question is, where does not supporting alternative namespaces leave some one like me? (A single developer trying to piece together a whole development/deployment environment) Would you tell me to switch to POWL? |