On 04.03.2008 21:16 Uhr, "Joe Strout" <jo...@st...> wrote:
> We need to take care to distinguish between an AST and a CST
> (Concrete Syntax Tree), though. A CST can always be converted into
> an AST, but the reverse is not true
Good point, so we should probably strive to generate a CST from the source
parsing, then continue to work with that tree for further operations.
Thomas
|
