When I issue the first command, I get the following:
[root@ravenix razertool-0.0.6]# pkg-config --exists --print-errors "libusb"
Package libusb was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libusb.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'libusb' found
[root@ravenix razertool-0.0.6]# echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
I am attempting to install RazerTool on my Fedora Core 4 box, and getting the following error when I ./configure:
checking for libusb... configure: error: Package requirements (libusb >= 0.1.0) were not met:
No package 'libusb' found
However,
Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
package libusb-0.1.10a-1 is already installed
Has anyone else run into this?
pkg-config isn't able to find that package, try:
$ pkg-config --exists --print-errors "libusb"
$ ldconfig (as root)
$ ./configure
When I issue the first command, I get the following:
[root@ravenix razertool-0.0.6]# pkg-config --exists --print-errors "libusb"
Package libusb was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libusb.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'libusb' found
[root@ravenix razertool-0.0.6]# echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
[root@ravenix razertool-0.0.6]#
[root@ravenix /]# find / -noleaf -name libusb*
/etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner
/home/brookr/razer/libusb-0.1.10a-1.i386.rpm
/usr/share/doc/libusb-devel-0.1.10a
/usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.2
/usr/lib/libusbpp.so
/usr/lib/libusbpp-0.1.so.4.4.2
/usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4
/usr/lib/libusb.a
/usr/lib/libusbpp.a
/usr/lib/libusb.la
/usr/lib/libusb.so
/usr/lib/libusbpp.la
/usr/lib/libusbpp-0.1.so.4
/usr/bin/libusb-config
So, it looks like the PKG_CONFIG_PATH vatiable is not set, and libusb.pc does not exist on my system in spite of the libusb rpm being installed?
You need the -dev or -devel rpm for it installed too (also need it for the other libraries)
The libusb-devel package is already installed:
[root@ravenix razer]# rpm -qa libusb-devel
libusb-devel-0.1.10a-1
so that can't be it . . .