Re: [Raypp-general] Makefile

[Tim M. <ti...@se...>]

Andreas Kahler said:

>> I think a reasonable compromise would be to build multiple translation
>> units  in the CVS, but possibly release tarballs with the fast compile
>> switched on.  Any thoughts?
>
> I personally prefer a single simple solution, since it much easier to
> maintain. Adding a file to the ray++.cxx is easier than modifying the
> Makefile  especially if you work on Windows where you cannot test if
> the Makefile works.

But this doesn't get round the problem that if you modify one of the
existing files you're stuck with another long compile.
If everyone else is happy with things the way they are, then I'll just use
my own build scripts myself and not submit anything.
Tim